Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(186)

Issue 2372983002: Make 'webrtc' a static library. (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 2 months ago by kjellander_webrtc
Modified:
4 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
the sun
CC:
webrtc-reviews_webrtc.org, tterriberry_mozilla.com, qiang.lu, niklas.enbom, yujie_mao (webrtc), peah-webrtc
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
webrtc
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Make 'webrtc' a static library. Most other targets were converted to static_library to match the GYP build in https://codereview.webrtc.org/2361623004. The monolithic 'webrtc' wasn't converted due to a limitation in libtool on Mac: it will fail if there are no object files to link (see http://crbug.com/625874). Because of that, a no_op_function.cc source file was added to the sources here, even if it's not used. This will be further refactored in the future as part of the Slim and Modular effort (bugs.webrtc.org/5716). BUG=webrtc:6418, webrtc:6410 NOTRY=True Committed: https://crrev.com/ee99696592ecc147af74243dcf1709a39ca7f744 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#14403}

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Introduced webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 3 : Adding namespace #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 4 : Added TODOs #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+12 lines, -8 lines) Patch
M webrtc/BUILD.gn View 1 2 3 1 chunk +4 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
A + webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc View 1 2 3 1 chunk +8 lines, -7 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 18 (9 generated)
kjellander_webrtc
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 06:53:15 UTC) #3
kjellander_webrtc
Assuming win is happy, should we go with this?
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 12:22:38 UTC) #6
the sun
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2372983002/diff/60001/webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc File webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc (right): https://codereview.webrtc.org/2372983002/diff/60001/webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc#newcode13 webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc:13: int foobarbaz() { put it in namespace webrtc {
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 12:59:46 UTC) #7
kjellander_webrtc
PTAL https://codereview.webrtc.org/2372983002/diff/60001/webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc File webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc (right): https://codereview.webrtc.org/2372983002/diff/60001/webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc#newcode13 webrtc/build/no_op_function.cc:13: int foobarbaz() { On 2016/09/27 12:59:45, the sun ...
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 13:06:47 UTC) #8
the sun
lgtm It's not pretty, but if the workaround unblocks downstream and allows us to move ...
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 13:25:23 UTC) #9
kjellander_webrtc
On 2016/09/27 13:25:23, the sun wrote: > lgtm > > It's not pretty, but if ...
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 18:38:14 UTC) #11
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.webrtc.org/2372983002/100001
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 19:03:39 UTC) #14
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #4 (id:100001)
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 19:13:17 UTC) #16
commit-bot: I haz the power
4 years, 2 months ago (2016-09-27 19:13:25 UTC) #18
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 4 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/ee99696592ecc147af74243dcf1709a39ca7f744
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#14403}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698