Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class

Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class (patchset #2 id:60001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2010763003/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks downstream Android tests:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: no field with name='framerate' signature='org/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat$FramerateRange' in class Lorg/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat;

We should have a similar test in WebRTC so we can catch such errors pre-commit.

Original issue's description:
> Android: Add FramerateRange class
>
> The Camera1 and Camera2 API use different framerate range types. Camera1
> uses int[2] and Camera2 uses Range<Integer>. Range<Integer> is
> unfortunately only available on Lollipop and later, so this CL adds a
> similar FramerateRange class in CaptureFormat.
>
> The purpose with this CL is to have a common framerate range type that can
> be reused from both Camera1 and Camera2 in helper functions such as
> CameraEnumerationAndroid.getClosestSupportedFramerateRange().
>
> BUG=webrtc:5519
> R=sakal@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/94cb67d6df1a78e7fa25e469f719c1a8809dc583
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12942}

TBR=sakal@webrtc.org,magjed@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True
BUG=webrtc:5519
Committed: https://crrev.com/bd5621f065fd25e0a77307f10dc9ddaf76e7945f
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12956}

[kjellander_webrtc, 2016-05-30 05:46:13]

Created Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class

[kjellander_webrtc, 2016-05-30 05:48:39]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class (patchset #2 id:60001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2010763003/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks downstream Android tests:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: no field with name='framerate'
signature='org/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat$FramerateRange' in
class Lorg/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat;

We should have a similar test in WebRTC so we can catch such errors pre-commit.

Original issue's description:
> Android: Add FramerateRange class
> 
> The Camera1 and Camera2 API use different framerate range types. Camera1
> uses int[2] and Camera2 uses Range<Integer>. Range<Integer> is
> unfortunately only available on Lollipop and later, so this CL adds a
> similar FramerateRange class in CaptureFormat.
> 
> The purpose with this CL is to have a common framerate range type that can
> be reused from both Camera1 and Camera2 in helper functions such as
> CameraEnumerationAndroid.getClosestSupportedFramerateRange().
> 
> BUG=webrtc:5519
> R=sakal@webrtc.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/94cb67d6df1a78e7fa25e469f719c1a8809dc583
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12942}

TBR=sakal@webrtc.org,magjed@webrtc.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=webrtc:5519
==========

to

==========
Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class (patchset #2 id:60001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2010763003/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks downstream Android tests:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: no field with name='framerate'
signature='org/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat$FramerateRange' in
class Lorg/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat;

We should have a similar test in WebRTC so we can catch such errors pre-commit.

Original issue's description:
> Android: Add FramerateRange class
> 
> The Camera1 and Camera2 API use different framerate range types. Camera1
> uses int[2] and Camera2 uses Range<Integer>. Range<Integer> is
> unfortunately only available on Lollipop and later, so this CL adds a
> similar FramerateRange class in CaptureFormat.
> 
> The purpose with this CL is to have a common framerate range type that can
> be reused from both Camera1 and Camera2 in helper functions such as
> CameraEnumerationAndroid.getClosestSupportedFramerateRange().
> 
> BUG=webrtc:5519
> R=sakal@webrtc.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/94cb67d6df1a78e7fa25e469f719c1a8809dc583
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12942}

TBR=sakal@webrtc.org,magjed@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True
BUG=webrtc:5519
==========

[kjellander_webrtc, 2016-05-30 06:01:48]

The CQ bit was checked by kjellander@webrtc.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-30 06:01:54]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/2024573002/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/2024573002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-30 06:06:30]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class (patchset #2 id:60001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2010763003/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks downstream Android tests:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: no field with name='framerate'
signature='org/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat$FramerateRange' in
class Lorg/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat;

We should have a similar test in WebRTC so we can catch such errors pre-commit.

Original issue's description:
> Android: Add FramerateRange class
> 
> The Camera1 and Camera2 API use different framerate range types. Camera1
> uses int[2] and Camera2 uses Range<Integer>. Range<Integer> is
> unfortunately only available on Lollipop and later, so this CL adds a
> similar FramerateRange class in CaptureFormat.
> 
> The purpose with this CL is to have a common framerate range type that can
> be reused from both Camera1 and Camera2 in helper functions such as
> CameraEnumerationAndroid.getClosestSupportedFramerateRange().
> 
> BUG=webrtc:5519
> R=sakal@webrtc.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/94cb67d6df1a78e7fa25e469f719c1a8809dc583
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12942}

TBR=sakal@webrtc.org,magjed@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True
BUG=webrtc:5519
==========

to

==========
Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class (patchset #2 id:60001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2010763003/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks downstream Android tests:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: no field with name='framerate'
signature='org/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat$FramerateRange' in
class Lorg/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat;

We should have a similar test in WebRTC so we can catch such errors pre-commit.

Original issue's description:
> Android: Add FramerateRange class
> 
> The Camera1 and Camera2 API use different framerate range types. Camera1
> uses int[2] and Camera2 uses Range<Integer>. Range<Integer> is
> unfortunately only available on Lollipop and later, so this CL adds a
> similar FramerateRange class in CaptureFormat.
> 
> The purpose with this CL is to have a common framerate range type that can
> be reused from both Camera1 and Camera2 in helper functions such as
> CameraEnumerationAndroid.getClosestSupportedFramerateRange().
> 
> BUG=webrtc:5519
> R=sakal@webrtc.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/94cb67d6df1a78e7fa25e469f719c1a8809dc583
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12942}

TBR=sakal@webrtc.org,magjed@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True
BUG=webrtc:5519
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-30 06:06:31]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-30 06:06:37]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class (patchset #2 id:60001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2010763003/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks downstream Android tests:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: no field with name='framerate'
signature='org/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat$FramerateRange' in
class Lorg/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat;

We should have a similar test in WebRTC so we can catch such errors pre-commit.

Original issue's description:
> Android: Add FramerateRange class
> 
> The Camera1 and Camera2 API use different framerate range types. Camera1
> uses int[2] and Camera2 uses Range<Integer>. Range<Integer> is
> unfortunately only available on Lollipop and later, so this CL adds a
> similar FramerateRange class in CaptureFormat.
> 
> The purpose with this CL is to have a common framerate range type that can
> be reused from both Camera1 and Camera2 in helper functions such as
> CameraEnumerationAndroid.getClosestSupportedFramerateRange().
> 
> BUG=webrtc:5519
> R=sakal@webrtc.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/94cb67d6df1a78e7fa25e469f719c1a8809dc583
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12942}

TBR=sakal@webrtc.org,magjed@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True
BUG=webrtc:5519
==========

to

==========
Revert of Android: Add FramerateRange class (patchset #2 id:60001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2010763003/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks downstream Android tests:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: no field with name='framerate'
signature='org/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat$FramerateRange' in
class Lorg/webrtc/CameraEnumerationAndroid$CaptureFormat;

We should have a similar test in WebRTC so we can catch such errors pre-commit.

Original issue's description:
> Android: Add FramerateRange class
>
> The Camera1 and Camera2 API use different framerate range types. Camera1
> uses int[2] and Camera2 uses Range<Integer>. Range<Integer> is
> unfortunately only available on Lollipop and later, so this CL adds a
> similar FramerateRange class in CaptureFormat.
>
> The purpose with this CL is to have a common framerate range type that can
> be reused from both Camera1 and Camera2 in helper functions such as
> CameraEnumerationAndroid.getClosestSupportedFramerateRange().
>
> BUG=webrtc:5519
> R=sakal@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/94cb67d6df1a78e7fa25e469f719c1a8809dc583
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12942}

TBR=sakal@webrtc.org,magjed@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True
BUG=webrtc:5519

Committed: https://crrev.com/bd5621f065fd25e0a77307f10dc9ddaf76e7945f
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12956}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-30 06:06:38]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/bd5621f065fd25e0a77307f10dc9ddaf76e7945f
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12956}

[magjed_webrtc, 2016-05-30 10:53:32]

A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2019333002/ by magjed@webrtc.org.

The reason for reverting is: Updated signature to work with other JNI versions..