What can't loopback test be more like full stack test?

What can't loopback test be more like full stack test?

It can; this CL makes it a lot closer, if not all the way to a merge.
Performance from video_loopback and screenshare_loopback should now
match what we're seeing in FullStackTest, which will make debugging and
assesment of quality differences much easier.

It also adds the ability to view all of the simulcast streams at once,
in separate windows.

BUG=webrtc:7694
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2946893003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18703}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/1168fd4ed560176987116f06f5a3bd257d471d6e

[sprang_webrtc, 2017-06-20 14:36:14]

sprang@webrtc.org changed reviewers:
+ ilnik@webrtc.org

[ilnik, 2017-06-20 15:11:33]

On 2017/06/20 14:36:15, sprang_webrtc wrote:

lgtm

[sprang_webrtc, 2017-06-21 11:29:20]

The CQ bit was checked by sprang@webrtc.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 11:29:31]

CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.webrtc.org/...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 11:31:20]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 11:31:20]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  ios32_sim_ios9_dbg on master.tryserver.webrtc (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.webrtc/builders/ios32_sim_ios9_dbg/buil...)
  ios_dbg on master.tryserver.webrtc (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.webrtc/builders/ios_dbg/builds/26673)
  ios_rel on master.tryserver.webrtc (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.webrtc/builders/ios_rel/builds/25652)

[sprang_webrtc, 2017-06-21 13:01:29]

The CQ bit was checked by sprang@webrtc.org

[sprang_webrtc, 2017-06-21 13:01:29]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from ilnik@webrtc.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2946893003/#ps20001 (title:
"Rebase")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 13:01:39]

CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.webrtc.org/...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 13:05:48]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 13:05:49]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  mac_baremetal on master.tryserver.webrtc (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.webrtc/builders/mac_baremetal/builds/22533)

[sprang_webrtc, 2017-06-21 13:21:07]

The CQ bit was checked by sprang@webrtc.org

[sprang_webrtc, 2017-06-21 13:21:08]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from ilnik@webrtc.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2946893003/#ps40001 (title:
"gn fix")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 13:21:18]

CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.webrtc.org/...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 13:30:28]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 13:30:29]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  android_dbg on master.tryserver.webrtc (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.webrtc/builders/android_dbg/builds/25164)

[sprang_webrtc, 2017-06-21 14:39:02]

The CQ bit was checked by sprang@webrtc.org

[sprang_webrtc, 2017-06-21 14:39:02]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from ilnik@webrtc.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2946893003/#ps60001 (title:
"Explicit cast to make win happy")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 14:39:09]

CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.webrtc.org/...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 16:00:23]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 60001, "attempt_start_ts": 1498055942032830,
"parent_rev": "10894996efb088c305db07365c1871e02c98a818", "commit_rev":
"1168fd4ed560176987116f06f5a3bd257d471d6e"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 16:00:29]

Description was changed from

==========
What can't loopback test be more like full stack test?

It can; this CL makes it a lot closer, if not all the way to a merge.
Performance from video_loopback and screenshare_loopback should now
match what we're seeing in FullStackTest, which will make debugging and
assesment of quality differences much easier.

It also adds the ability to view all of the simulcast streams at once,
in separate windows.

BUG=webrtc:7694
==========

to

==========
What can't loopback test be more like full stack test?

It can; this CL makes it a lot closer, if not all the way to a merge.
Performance from video_loopback and screenshare_loopback should now
match what we're seeing in FullStackTest, which will make debugging and
assesment of quality differences much easier.

It also adds the ability to view all of the simulcast streams at once,
in separate windows.

BUG=webrtc:7694

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2946893003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18703}
Committed:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/1168fd4ed560176987116f06f...
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-06-21 16:00:30]

Committed patchset #4 (id:60001) as
https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/1168fd4ed560176987116f06f...