Revert of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct."

Revert of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct." (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/1498953002/ )

Reason for revert:
Broke downstream compile step, possibly relandable when using a MSVC version that has constexpr, other than that I'm out of ideas.

.../webrtc/base/atomicops.h:71:8: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'const rtc::AtomicInt&'

Original issue's description:
> Reland of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct."
>
> Relands https://codereview.webrtc.org/1420043008/ with brace initializers
> instead of constructors hoping that they won't introduce static
> initializers.
>
> BUG=
> R=tommi@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/84f0970d100e67a1dc4fe9a1b16b7d293302044e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10920}

TBR=tommi@webrtc.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/46ad5426b025eddac8e9232014d347e73d27180e
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10922}

[pbos-webrtc, 2015-12-07 22:29:03]

Created Revert of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct."

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-12-07 22:29:04]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1505053002/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1505053002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-12-07 22:29:17]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct." (patchset #3 id:40001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1498953002/ )

Reason for revert:
Broke downstream compile step, possibly relandable when using a MSVC version
that has constexpr, other than that I'm out of ideas.

.../webrtc/base/atomicops.h:71:8: note:   no known conversion for argument 1
from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'const rtc::AtomicInt&'

Original issue's description:
> Reland of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct."
> 
> Relands https://codereview.webrtc.org/1420043008/ with brace initializers
> instead of constructors hoping that they won't introduce static
> initializers.
> 
> BUG=
> R=tommi@webrtc.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/84f0970d100e67a1dc4fe9a1b16b7d293302044e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10920}

TBR=tommi@webrtc.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
==========

to

==========
Revert of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct." (patchset #3 id:40001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1498953002/ )

Reason for revert:
Broke downstream compile step, possibly relandable when using a MSVC version
that has constexpr, other than that I'm out of ideas.

.../webrtc/base/atomicops.h:71:8: note:   no known conversion for argument 1
from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'const rtc::AtomicInt&'

Original issue's description:
> Reland of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct."
> 
> Relands https://codereview.webrtc.org/1420043008/ with brace initializers
> instead of constructors hoping that they won't introduce static
> initializers.
> 
> BUG=
> R=tommi@webrtc.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/84f0970d100e67a1dc4fe9a1b16b7d293302044e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10920}

TBR=tommi@webrtc.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-12-07 22:29:18]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-12-07 22:29:29]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct." (patchset #3 id:40001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1498953002/ )

Reason for revert:
Broke downstream compile step, possibly relandable when using a MSVC version
that has constexpr, other than that I'm out of ideas.

.../webrtc/base/atomicops.h:71:8: note:   no known conversion for argument 1
from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'const rtc::AtomicInt&'

Original issue's description:
> Reland of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct."
> 
> Relands https://codereview.webrtc.org/1420043008/ with brace initializers
> instead of constructors hoping that they won't introduce static
> initializers.
> 
> BUG=
> R=tommi@webrtc.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/84f0970d100e67a1dc4fe9a1b16b7d293302044e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10920}

TBR=tommi@webrtc.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
==========

to

==========
Revert of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct." (patchset #3 id:40001 of
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1498953002/ )

Reason for revert:
Broke downstream compile step, possibly relandable when using a MSVC version
that has constexpr, other than that I'm out of ideas.

.../webrtc/base/atomicops.h:71:8: note:   no known conversion for argument 1
from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'const rtc::AtomicInt&'

Original issue's description:
> Reland of "Create rtc::AtomicInt POD struct."
>
> Relands https://codereview.webrtc.org/1420043008/ with brace initializers
> instead of constructors hoping that they won't introduce static
> initializers.
>
> BUG=
> R=tommi@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/84f0970d100e67a1dc4fe9a1b16b7d293302044e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10920}

TBR=tommi@webrtc.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/46ad5426b025eddac8e9232014d347e73d27180e
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10922}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-12-07 22:29:30]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/46ad5426b025eddac8e9232014d347e73d27180e
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10922}

[pbos-webrtc, 2015-12-07 22:33:35]

This is the final idea I've got, WDYT?

https://codereview.webrtc.org/1505053002/diff/1/webrtc/base/atomicops.h
File webrtc/base/atomicops.h (left):

https://codereview.webrtc.org/1505053002/diff/1/webrtc/base/atomicops.h#oldco...
webrtc/base/atomicops.h:72: AtomicInt() = delete;
Might be relandable without constructors removed (it "should" behave like a
struct for initialization).