webrtc/modules/audio_device/noop.cc - Issue 2991343002: Decoupling audio_device from Obj-C code

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: webrtc/modules/audio_device/noop.cc

Issue 2991343002: Decoupling audio_device from Obj-C code (Closed)

Patch Set: Private visibility for audio_device_objc_unittests Created 3 years, 4 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

OLD	NEW
(Empty)
	1 /*

	2 * Copyright (c) 2017 The WebRTC project authors. All Rights Reserved.

	3 *

	4 * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license

	5 * that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source

	6 * tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found

	7 * in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may

	8 * be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.

	9 */

	10

	11 // This is supposed to be empty because it is only needed as a workaround

	12 // to compile webrtc/rtc_base:rtc_base_approved.
	kjellander_webrtc 2017/08/16 09:31:53 The target here is wrong, right? Better make the c The target here is wrong, right? Better make the comment generic and mention it's needed to compile a rtc_static_library target, since I believe that's the reason, right?
OLD	NEW