Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(468)

Unified Diff: webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender_unittest.cc

Issue 2947133002: Fix timing frames and FEC conflict (Closed)
Patch Set: Added test for not sending FEC on timing frames Created 3 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender.cc ('k') | webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender_video.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender_unittest.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender_unittest.cc b/webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender_unittest.cc
index 3e9ed6e195416c930f4652327ef57b5ed83b5248..5d31a673506cce3eb2e24e68e1bb9f1462c17c4a 100644
--- a/webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender_unittest.cc
+++ b/webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender_unittest.cc
@@ -463,9 +463,7 @@ TEST_P(RtpSenderTest, SendsPacketsWithTransportSequenceNumber) {
EXPECT_EQ(transport_.last_packet_id_, transport_seq_no);
}
-// Disabled due to webrtc:7859. Until issues with FEC resolved, pacer exit
-// timstamp is not updated in the pacer.
-TEST_P(RtpSenderTestWithoutPacer, DISABLED_WritesTimestampToTimingExtension) {
+TEST_P(RtpSenderTestWithoutPacer, WritesTimestampToTimingExtension) {
rtp_sender_->SetStorePacketsStatus(true, 10);
EXPECT_EQ(0, rtp_sender_->RegisterRtpHeaderExtension(
kRtpExtensionVideoTiming, kVideoTimingExtensionId));
@@ -944,6 +942,71 @@ TEST_P(RtpSenderTest, SendFlexfecPackets) {
EXPECT_EQ(kFlexfecSsrc, flexfec_packet.Ssrc());
}
+// TODO(ilnik): because of webrtc:7859. Once FEC moved below pacer, this test
+// should be removed.
+TEST_P(RtpSenderTest, NoFlexForTimingFrames) {
brandtr 2017/06/21 13:10:27 Flexfec
ilnik 2017/06/21 13:28:06 Done.
+ constexpr int kMediaPayloadType = 127;
+ constexpr int kFlexfecPayloadType = 118;
+ constexpr uint32_t kMediaSsrc = 1234;
+ constexpr uint32_t kFlexfecSsrc = 5678;
+ const std::vector<RtpExtension> kNoRtpExtensions;
+ const std::vector<RtpExtensionSize> kNoRtpExtensionSizes;
+ FlexfecSender flexfec_sender(kFlexfecPayloadType, kFlexfecSsrc, kMediaSsrc,
+ kNoRtpExtensions, kNoRtpExtensionSizes,
+ nullptr /* rtp_state */, &fake_clock_);
+
+ // Reset |rtp_sender_| to use FlexFEC.
+ rtp_sender_.reset(new RTPSender(
+ false, &fake_clock_, &transport_, &mock_paced_sender_, &flexfec_sender,
+ &seq_num_allocator_, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr,
+ &mock_rtc_event_log_, &send_packet_observer_,
+ &retransmission_rate_limiter_, nullptr));
+ rtp_sender_->SetSSRC(kMediaSsrc);
+ rtp_sender_->SetSequenceNumber(kSeqNum);
+ rtp_sender_->SetSendPayloadType(kMediaPayloadType);
+ rtp_sender_->SetStorePacketsStatus(true, 10);
+
+ // Parameters selected to generate a single FEC packet per media packet.
+ FecProtectionParams params;
+ params.fec_rate = 15;
+ params.max_fec_frames = 1;
+ params.fec_mask_type = kFecMaskRandom;
+ rtp_sender_->SetFecParameters(params, params);
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock_paced_sender_,
+ InsertPacket(RtpPacketSender::kLowPriority, kMediaSsrc, kSeqNum,
+ _, _, false));
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock_paced_sender_, InsertPacket(RtpPacketSender::kLowPriority,
+ kFlexfecSsrc, _, _, _, false))
+ .Times(0); // Not called because packet should not be protected.
+
+ const uint32_t kTimestamp = 1234;
+ const uint8_t kPayloadType = 127;
+ const int64_t kCaptureTimeMs = fake_clock_.TimeInMilliseconds();
+ char payload_name[RTP_PAYLOAD_NAME_SIZE] = "GENERIC";
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, rtp_sender_->RegisterPayload(payload_name, kPayloadType, 90000,
+ 0, 1500));
+ RTPVideoHeader video_header;
+ memset(&video_header, 0, sizeof(RTPVideoHeader));
+ video_header.video_timing.is_timing_frame = true;
brandtr 2017/06/21 13:10:26 How about sending the same frame, but with |is_tim
ilnik 2017/06/21 13:28:06 It's already done in RtpSenderTestWithoutPacer.Sen
brandtr 2017/06/21 13:32:00 Right, this is just to verify that FEC actually wo
ilnik 2017/06/21 13:50:47 Acknowledged.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(rtp_sender_->SendOutgoingData(
+ kVideoFrameKey, kPayloadType, kTimestamp, kCaptureTimeMs, kPayloadData,
+ sizeof(kPayloadData), nullptr, &video_header, nullptr));
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock_rtc_event_log_,
+ LogRtpHeader(PacketDirection::kOutgoingPacket, _, _, _))
+ .Times(1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(rtp_sender_->TimeToSendPacket(kMediaSsrc, kSeqNum,
+ fake_clock_.TimeInMilliseconds(),
+ false, PacedPacketInfo()));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, transport_.packets_sent());
+ const RtpPacketReceived& media_packet = transport_.sent_packets_[0];
+ EXPECT_EQ(kMediaPayloadType, media_packet.PayloadType());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kSeqNum, media_packet.SequenceNumber());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kMediaSsrc, media_packet.Ssrc());
+}
+
+
TEST_P(RtpSenderTestWithoutPacer, SendFlexfecPackets) {
constexpr int kMediaPayloadType = 127;
constexpr int kFlexfecPayloadType = 118;
« no previous file with comments | « webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender.cc ('k') | webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/source/rtp_sender_video.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698