Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(381)

Unified Diff: webrtc/video/end_to_end_tests.cc

Issue 2912713002: Persist RTP state for FlexFEC. (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 3 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: webrtc/video/end_to_end_tests.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/video/end_to_end_tests.cc b/webrtc/video/end_to_end_tests.cc
index 3324bbf5f636f1ab66d8e06e4b09ae16d59b1111..424517f4b29e500a39be2fd3cb3abdaa7788affc 100644
--- a/webrtc/video/end_to_end_tests.cc
+++ b/webrtc/video/end_to_end_tests.cc
@@ -4145,6 +4145,169 @@ TEST_F(EndToEndTest, MAYBE_PictureIdStateRetainedAfterReinitingVp8) {
TestPictureIdStatePreservation(encoder.get());
}
+TEST_F(EndToEndTest, TestFlexfecRtpStatePreservation) {
+ class RtpSequenceObserver : public test::RtpRtcpObserver {
+ public:
+ RtpSequenceObserver()
+ : test::RtpRtcpObserver(kDefaultTimeoutMs),
+ num_flexfec_packets_sent_(0) {}
+
+ void ResetPacketCount() {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ num_flexfec_packets_sent_ = 0;
+ }
+
+ private:
+ Action OnSendRtp(const uint8_t* packet, size_t length) override {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+
+ RTPHeader header;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parser_->Parse(packet, length, &header));
+ const uint16_t sequence_number = header.sequenceNumber;
+ const uint32_t timestamp = header.timestamp;
+ const uint32_t ssrc = header.ssrc;
+
+ if (ssrc == kVideoSendSsrcs[0] || ssrc == kSendRtxSsrcs[0]) {
+ return SEND_PACKET;
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(kFlexfecSendSsrc, ssrc) << "Unknown SSRC sent.";
+
+ ++num_flexfec_packets_sent_;
+
+ // If this is the first packet, we have nothing to compare to.
+ if (!last_observed_sequence_number_) {
+ last_observed_sequence_number_.emplace(sequence_number);
+ last_observed_timestamp_.emplace(timestamp);
+
+ return SEND_PACKET;
+ }
+
+ // Verify continuity and monotonicity of RTP sequence numbers.
danilchap 2017/05/29 08:09:35 what are testing with this expectation? FakeNetwor
brandtr 2017/05/29 14:40:15 I'm checking that the sequence number increments b
+ EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<uint16_t>(*last_observed_sequence_number_ + 1),
+ sequence_number);
+ last_observed_sequence_number_.emplace(sequence_number);
+
+ // Verify that timestamps are reasonably close.
+ const int timestamp_abs_diff =
+ std::abs(static_cast<int>(timestamp) -
+ static_cast<int>(*last_observed_timestamp_));
danilchap 2017/05/29 08:09:35 what about timestamp wrap? modules/module_common_t
brandtr 2017/05/29 14:40:15 Cool, I'll use module_common_types.h :)
+ EXPECT_LT(timestamp_abs_diff, 10 * 90000);
danilchap 2017/05/29 08:09:35 prefer to use named constant instead of 90000. May
brandtr 2017/05/29 14:40:15 Done.
+ last_observed_timestamp_.emplace(timestamp);
+
+ // Pass test when enough packets have been let through.
+ if (num_flexfec_packets_sent_ >= 10) {
+ observation_complete_.Set();
+ }
+
+ return SEND_PACKET;
+ }
+
+ rtc::Optional<uint16_t> last_observed_sequence_number_ GUARDED_BY(crit_);
+ rtc::Optional<uint32_t> last_observed_timestamp_ GUARDED_BY(crit_);
+ size_t num_flexfec_packets_sent_ GUARDED_BY(crit_);
+ rtc::CriticalSection crit_;
+ } observer;
+
+ Call::Config config(event_log_.get());
+ CreateCalls(config, config);
+
+ FakeNetworkPipe::Config lossy_delayed_link;
+ lossy_delayed_link.loss_percent = 2;
+ lossy_delayed_link.queue_delay_ms = 50;
+ test::PacketTransport send_transport(sender_call_.get(), &observer,
+ test::PacketTransport::kSender,
+ payload_type_map_, lossy_delayed_link);
+ send_transport.SetReceiver(receiver_call_->Receiver());
+
+ FakeNetworkPipe::Config flawless_link;
+ test::PacketTransport receive_transport(nullptr, &observer,
+ test::PacketTransport::kReceiver,
+ payload_type_map_, flawless_link);
+ receive_transport.SetReceiver(sender_call_->Receiver());
+
+ // For reduced flakyness, we use a real VP8 encoder together with NACK
+ // and RTX.
+ const int kNumVideoStreams = 1;
+ const int kNumFlexfecStreams = 1;
+ CreateSendConfig(kNumVideoStreams, 0, kNumFlexfecStreams, &send_transport);
+ std::unique_ptr<VideoEncoder> encoder(VP8Encoder::Create());
+ video_send_config_.encoder_settings.encoder = encoder.get();
+ video_send_config_.encoder_settings.payload_name = "VP8";
+ video_send_config_.encoder_settings.payload_type = kVideoSendPayloadType;
+ video_send_config_.rtp.nack.rtp_history_ms = kNackRtpHistoryMs;
+ video_send_config_.rtp.rtx.ssrcs.push_back(kSendRtxSsrcs[0]);
+ video_send_config_.rtp.rtx.payload_type = kSendRtxPayloadType;
+
+ CreateMatchingReceiveConfigs(&receive_transport);
+ video_receive_configs_[0].rtp.nack.rtp_history_ms = kNackRtpHistoryMs;
+ video_receive_configs_[0].rtp.rtx_ssrc = kSendRtxSsrcs[0];
+ video_receive_configs_[0].rtp.rtx_payload_types[kVideoSendPayloadType] =
+ kSendRtxPayloadType;
+
+ // The matching FlexFEC receive config is not created by
+ // CreateMatchingReceiveConfigs since this is not a test::BaseTest.
+ // Set up the receive config manually instead.
+ FlexfecReceiveStream::Config flexfec_receive_config(&receive_transport);
+ flexfec_receive_config.payload_type =
+ video_send_config_.rtp.flexfec.payload_type;
+ flexfec_receive_config.remote_ssrc = video_send_config_.rtp.flexfec.ssrc;
+ flexfec_receive_config.protected_media_ssrcs =
+ video_send_config_.rtp.flexfec.protected_media_ssrcs;
+ flexfec_receive_config.local_ssrc = kReceiverLocalVideoSsrc;
+ flexfec_receive_config.transport_cc = true;
+ flexfec_receive_config.rtp_header_extensions.push_back(
danilchap 2017/05/29 08:09:35 there is shortcut for pattern std::vector<T>::push
brandtr 2017/05/29 14:40:14 Done.
+ RtpExtension(RtpExtension::kTransportSequenceNumberUri,
+ test::kTransportSequenceNumberExtensionId));
+ flexfec_receive_configs_.push_back(flexfec_receive_config);
+
+ CreateFlexfecStreams();
+ CreateVideoStreams();
+
+ // RTCP might be disabled if the network is "down".
+ sender_call_->SignalChannelNetworkState(MediaType::VIDEO, kNetworkUp);
+ receiver_call_->SignalChannelNetworkState(MediaType::VIDEO, kNetworkUp);
+
+ const int kFrameMaxWidth = 320;
+ const int kFrameMaxHeight = 180;
+ const int kFrameRate = 15;
+ CreateFrameGeneratorCapturer(kFrameRate, kFrameMaxWidth, kFrameMaxHeight);
+
+ // Initial test.
+ Start();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(observer.Wait()) << "Timed out waiting for packets.";
+
+ // Ensure monotonicity when the VideoSendStream is restarted.
+ auto restart_video_send_stream_and_test = [this, &observer]() {
+ Stop();
+ observer.ResetPacketCount();
+ Start();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(observer.Wait()) << "Timed out waiting for packets.";
+ };
+ restart_video_send_stream_and_test();
danilchap 2017/05/29 08:09:35 is it a simple loop? for (size_t i = 0; i < 2; ++i
brandtr 2017/05/29 14:40:14 Yes. I find this a bit easier to read though.
+ restart_video_send_stream_and_test();
+
+ // Ensure monotonicity when the VideoSendStream is recreated.
+ auto recreate_video_send_stream_and_test = [this, &observer]() {
+ frame_generator_capturer_->Stop();
+ sender_call_->DestroyVideoSendStream(video_send_stream_);
+ video_send_stream_ = sender_call_->CreateVideoSendStream(
+ video_send_config_.Copy(), video_encoder_config_.Copy());
+ video_send_stream_->Start();
+ CreateFrameGeneratorCapturer(kFrameRate, kFrameMaxWidth, kFrameMaxHeight);
+ frame_generator_capturer_->Start();
+ observer.ResetPacketCount();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(observer.Wait()) << "Timed out waiting for packets.";
+ };
+ recreate_video_send_stream_and_test();
+ recreate_video_send_stream_and_test();
+
+ // Cleanup.
+ send_transport.StopSending();
+ receive_transport.StopSending();
+ Stop();
+ DestroyStreams();
+}
+
TEST_F(EndToEndTest,
MAYBE_PictureIdStateRetainedAfterReinitingSimulcastEncoderAdapter) {
class VideoEncoderFactoryAdapter : public webrtc::VideoEncoderFactory {

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698