Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(340)

Unified Diff: webrtc/base/task_queue_unittest.cc

Issue 2709603002: Fix potential deadlock in TaskQueue's libevent PostTaskAndReply implementation (Closed)
Patch Set: Address comments Created 3 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « webrtc/base/task_queue_libevent.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: webrtc/base/task_queue_unittest.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/base/task_queue_unittest.cc b/webrtc/base/task_queue_unittest.cc
index 74433b91440117250fc72cc959326db0afa2f935..4389d35f59258f36122d54b41b18fc715572ee20 100644
--- a/webrtc/base/task_queue_unittest.cc
+++ b/webrtc/base/task_queue_unittest.cc
@@ -37,22 +37,21 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, Construct) {
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndCheckCurrent) {
static const char kQueueName[] = "PostAndCheckCurrent";
+ Event event(false, false);
TaskQueue queue(kQueueName);
// We're not running a task, so there shouldn't be a current queue.
EXPECT_FALSE(queue.IsCurrent());
EXPECT_FALSE(TaskQueue::Current());
- Event event(false, false);
queue.PostTask(Bind(&CheckCurrent, kQueueName, &event, &queue));
EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
}
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostCustomTask) {
static const char kQueueName[] = "PostCustomImplementation";
- TaskQueue queue(kQueueName);
-
Event event(false, false);
+ TaskQueue queue(kQueueName);
class CustomTask : public QueuedTask {
public:
@@ -74,18 +73,18 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostCustomTask) {
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostLambda) {
static const char kQueueName[] = "PostLambda";
+ Event event(false, false);
TaskQueue queue(kQueueName);
- Event event(false, false);
queue.PostTask([&event]() { event.Set(); });
EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
}
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostFromQueue) {
static const char kQueueName[] = "PostFromQueue";
+ Event event(false, false);
TaskQueue queue(kQueueName);
- Event event(false, false);
queue.PostTask(
[&event, &queue]() { queue.PostTask([&event]() { event.Set(); }); });
EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
@@ -93,9 +92,9 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostFromQueue) {
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostDelayed) {
static const char kQueueName[] = "PostDelayed";
+ Event event(false, false);
TaskQueue queue(kQueueName);
- Event event(false, false);
uint32_t start = Time();
queue.PostDelayedTask(Bind(&CheckCurrent, kQueueName, &event, &queue), 100);
EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
@@ -135,10 +134,10 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostDelayedAfterDestruct) {
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReply) {
static const char kPostQueue[] = "PostQueue";
static const char kReplyQueue[] = "ReplyQueue";
+ Event event(false, false);
TaskQueue post_queue(kPostQueue);
TaskQueue reply_queue(kReplyQueue);
- Event event(false, false);
post_queue.PostTaskAndReply(
Bind(&CheckCurrent, kPostQueue, nullptr, &post_queue),
Bind(&CheckCurrent, kReplyQueue, &event, &reply_queue), &reply_queue);
@@ -148,6 +147,7 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReply) {
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReuse) {
static const char kPostQueue[] = "PostQueue";
static const char kReplyQueue[] = "ReplyQueue";
+ Event event(false, false);
TaskQueue post_queue(kPostQueue);
TaskQueue reply_queue(kReplyQueue);
@@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReuse) {
Event* const event_;
};
- Event event(false, false);
std::unique_ptr<QueuedTask> task(
new ReusedTask(&call_count, &reply_queue, &event));
@@ -195,10 +194,10 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReuse) {
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReplyLambda) {
static const char kPostQueue[] = "PostQueue";
static const char kReplyQueue[] = "ReplyQueue";
+ Event event(false, false);
TaskQueue post_queue(kPostQueue);
TaskQueue reply_queue(kReplyQueue);
- Event event(false, false);
bool my_flag = false;
post_queue.PostTaskAndReply([&my_flag]() { my_flag = true; },
[&event]() { event.Set(); }, &reply_queue);
@@ -206,6 +205,21 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReplyLambda) {
EXPECT_TRUE(my_flag);
}
+// This test covers a particular bug that we had in the libevent implementation
+// where we could hit a deadlock while trying to post a reply task to a queue
+// that was being deleted. The test isn't guaranteed to hit that case but it's
+// written in a way that makes it likely and by running with --gtest_repeat=1000
+// the bug would occur. Alas, now it should be fixed.
+TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReplyDeadlock) {
+ Event event(false, false);
+ TaskQueue post_queue("PostQueue");
+ TaskQueue reply_queue("ReplyQueue");
+
+ post_queue.PostTaskAndReply([&event]() { event.Set(); }, []() {},
+ &reply_queue);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
+}
+
void TestPostTaskAndReply(TaskQueue* work_queue,
const char* work_queue_name,
Event* event) {
@@ -220,10 +234,10 @@ void TestPostTaskAndReply(TaskQueue* work_queue,
TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReply2) {
static const char kQueueName[] = "PostAndReply2";
static const char kWorkQueueName[] = "PostAndReply2_Worker";
+ Event event(false, false);
TaskQueue queue(kQueueName);
TaskQueue work_queue(kWorkQueueName);
- Event event(false, false);
queue.PostTask(
Bind(&TestPostTaskAndReply, &work_queue, kWorkQueueName, &event));
EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
« no previous file with comments | « webrtc/base/task_queue_libevent.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698