Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(176)

Unified Diff: webrtc/base/string_to_number_unittest.cc

Issue 2696003004: Added integer parsing functions in base/string_to_number.h (Closed)
Patch Set: Addressed comments. Created 3 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « webrtc/base/string_to_number.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: webrtc/base/string_to_number_unittest.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/base/string_to_number_unittest.cc b/webrtc/base/string_to_number_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00ebd4cae4f05a04683c4cb16cbe7bd4c1182831
--- /dev/null
+++ b/webrtc/base/string_to_number_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2017 The WebRTC Project Authors. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
+ * that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
+ * tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
+ * in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
+ * be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
+ */
+
+#include "webrtc/base/string_to_number.h"
+
+#include <string>
+#include <type_traits>
+#include <limits>
+
+#include "webrtc/base/gunit.h"
+
+namespace rtc {
+
+namespace {
+// clang-format off
+using IntegerTypes =
+ ::testing::Types<char,
+ signed char, unsigned char, // NOLINT(runtime/int)
+ short, unsigned short, // NOLINT(runtime/int)
+ int, unsigned int, // NOLINT(runtime/int)
+ long, unsigned long, // NOLINT(runtime/int)
+ long long, unsigned long long, // NOLINT(runtime/int)
+ int8_t, uint8_t,
+ int16_t, uint16_t,
+ int32_t, uint32_t,
+ int64_t, uint64_t>;
+// clang-format on
+
+template <typename T>
+class BasicNumberTest : public ::testing::Test {};
+
+TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(BasicNumberTest);
+
+TYPED_TEST_P(BasicNumberTest, TestValidNumbers) {
+ using T = TypeParam;
+ constexpr T min_value = std::numeric_limits<T>::lowest();
+ constexpr T max_value = std::numeric_limits<T>::max();
+ const std::string min_string = std::to_string(min_value);
+ const std::string max_string = std::to_string(max_value);
+ EXPECT_EQ(min_value, StringToNumber<T>(min_string));
+ EXPECT_EQ(min_value, StringToNumber<T>(min_string.c_str()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(max_value, StringToNumber<T>(max_string));
+ EXPECT_EQ(max_value, StringToNumber<T>(max_string.c_str()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, StringToNumber<T>("0"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, StringToNumber<T>("-0"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, StringToNumber<T>(std::string("-0000000000000")));
+}
+
+TYPED_TEST_P(BasicNumberTest, TestInvalidNumbers) {
+ using T = TypeParam;
+ // Value ranges aren't strictly enforced in this test, since that would either
+ // require doctoring specific strings for each data type, which is a hassle
+ // across platforms, or to be able to do addition of values larger than the
+ // largest type, which is another hassle.
+ constexpr T min_value = std::numeric_limits<T>::lowest();
+ constexpr T max_value = std::numeric_limits<T>::max();
+ // If the type supports negative values, make the large negative value
+ // approximately ten times larger. If the type is unsigned, just use -2.
+ const std::string too_low_string =
+ (min_value == 0) ? "-2" : (std::to_string(min_value) + "1");
+ // Make the large value approximately ten times larger than the maximum.
+ const std::string too_large_string = std::to_string(max_value) + "1";
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(too_low_string));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(too_low_string.c_str()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(too_large_string));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(too_large_string.c_str()));
+}
+
+TYPED_TEST_P(BasicNumberTest, TestInvalidInputs) {
+ using T = TypeParam;
+ const char kInvalidCharArray[] = "Invalid string containing 47";
+ const char kPlusMinusCharArray[] = "+-100";
+ const char kNumberFollowedByCruft[] = "640x480";
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(kInvalidCharArray));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(),
+ StringToNumber<T>(std::string(kInvalidCharArray)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(kPlusMinusCharArray));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(),
+ StringToNumber<T>(std::string(kPlusMinusCharArray)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(kNumberFollowedByCruft));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(),
+ StringToNumber<T>(std::string(kNumberFollowedByCruft)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(" 5"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(" - 5"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>("- 5"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>(" -5"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<T>(), StringToNumber<T>("5 "));
+}
+
+REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(BasicNumberTest,
+ TestValidNumbers,
+ TestInvalidNumbers,
+ TestInvalidInputs);
+
+} // namespace
+
+INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(StringToNumberTest_Integers,
+ BasicNumberTest,
+ IntegerTypes);
+
+TEST(StringToNumberTest, TestSpecificValues) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<uint8_t>(), StringToNumber<uint8_t>("256"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<uint8_t>(), StringToNumber<uint8_t>("-256"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<int8_t>(), StringToNumber<int8_t>("256"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(rtc::Optional<int8_t>(), StringToNumber<int8_t>("-256"));
+}
+
+} // namespace rtc
« no previous file with comments | « webrtc/base/string_to_number.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698