Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(692)

Side by Side Diff: webrtc/api/test/mock_datachannel.h

Issue 2420473002: RTCDataChannelStats added. (Closed)
Patch Set: ForTesting Created 4 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
OLDNEW
1 /* 1 /*
2 * Copyright 2016 The WebRTC project authors. All Rights Reserved. 2 * Copyright 2016 The WebRTC project authors. All Rights Reserved.
3 * 3 *
4 * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license 4 * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
5 * that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source 5 * that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
6 * tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found 6 * tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
7 * in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may 7 * in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
8 * be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree. 8 * be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
9 */ 9 */
10 10
11 #ifndef WEBRTC_API_TEST_MOCK_DATACHANNEL_H_ 11 #ifndef WEBRTC_API_TEST_MOCK_DATACHANNEL_H_
12 #define WEBRTC_API_TEST_MOCK_DATACHANNEL_H_ 12 #define WEBRTC_API_TEST_MOCK_DATACHANNEL_H_
13 13
14 #include "webrtc/api/datachannel.h" 14 #include "webrtc/api/datachannel.h"
15 #include "webrtc/test/gmock.h" 15 #include "webrtc/test/gmock.h"
16 16
17 namespace webrtc { 17 namespace webrtc {
18 18
19 class MockDataChannel : public rtc::RefCountedObject<DataChannel> { 19 class MockDataChannel : public rtc::RefCountedObject<DataChannel> {
20 public: 20 public:
21 explicit MockDataChannel(DataState state) 21 MockDataChannel(int id, DataState state)
22 : MockDataChannel(id, state, 0, 0, 0, 0) {
23 }
Taylor Brandstetter 2016/10/18 17:28:11 Instead of these constructors, why not use EXPECT_
hbos 2016/10/18 19:13:38 Acknowledge. I could create a helper function that
24 MockDataChannel(
25 int id,
26 DataState state,
27 uint32_t messages_sent,
28 uint64_t bytes_sent,
29 uint32_t messages_received,
30 uint64_t bytes_received)
22 : rtc::RefCountedObject<DataChannel>( 31 : rtc::RefCountedObject<DataChannel>(
23 nullptr, cricket::DCT_NONE, "MockDataChannel") { 32 nullptr, cricket::DCT_NONE, "MockDataChannel") {
33 EXPECT_CALL(*this, id()).WillRepeatedly(testing::Return(id));
24 EXPECT_CALL(*this, state()).WillRepeatedly(testing::Return(state)); 34 EXPECT_CALL(*this, state()).WillRepeatedly(testing::Return(state));
35 EXPECT_CALL(*this, messages_sent()).WillRepeatedly(
36 testing::Return(messages_sent));
37 EXPECT_CALL(*this, bytes_sent()).WillRepeatedly(
38 testing::Return(bytes_sent));
39 EXPECT_CALL(*this, messages_received()).WillRepeatedly(
40 testing::Return(messages_received));
41 EXPECT_CALL(*this, bytes_received()).WillRepeatedly(
42 testing::Return(bytes_received));
25 } 43 }
44 MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(id, int());
26 MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(state, DataState()); 45 MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(state, DataState());
46 MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(messages_sent, uint32_t());
47 MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(bytes_sent, uint64_t());
48 MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(messages_received, uint32_t());
49 MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(bytes_received, uint64_t());
27 }; 50 };
28 51
29 } // namespace webrtc 52 } // namespace webrtc
30 53
31 #endif // WEBRTC_API_TEST_MOCK_DATACHANNEL_H_ 54 #endif // WEBRTC_API_TEST_MOCK_DATACHANNEL_H_
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698