Allow max 1 block per type in RTCP Extended Reports

Allow max 1 block per type in RTCP Extended Reports
Design of individual block in ExtendedReports packet suggest there is
no point to have more than one block per type.
This CL reduce complexity of having several blocks of the same type in
same report.

BUG=webrtc:5260
Committed: https://crrev.com/80ac24dd36b2df1c0faee5ae490b9a74db9c7464
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#14855}

[danilchap, 2016-10-18 14:07:18]

Patchset #5 (id:80001) has been deleted

[danilchap, 2016-10-18 14:07:29]

Patchset #4 (id:60001) has been deleted

[danilchap, 2016-10-18 14:40:26]

Patchset #5 (id:120001) has been deleted

[danilchap, 2016-10-18 14:41:38]

Patchset #2 (id:20001) has been deleted

[danilchap, 2016-10-20 08:30:10]

Patchset #5 (id:160001) has been deleted

[danilchap, 2016-10-20 08:33:45]

danilchap@webrtc.org changed reviewers:
+ sprang@webrtc.org

[sprang_webrtc, 2016-10-25 08:11:53]

lgtm

[danilchap, 2016-10-25 08:49:58]

The CQ bit was checked by danilchap@webrtc.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-10-25 08:50:00]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.webrtc.org/...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-10-25 08:52:09]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-10-25 08:52:12]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  presubmit on master.tryserver.webrtc (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.webrtc/builders/presubmit/builds/9509)

[danilchap, 2016-10-25 08:58:09]

Description was changed from

==========
Allow max 1 block per type in RTCP Extended Reports
Design of individual block in ExtendedReports packet suggest there is
no point to have more than one block per type.
This CL reduce complexity of having several blocks of the same type in
same report.

BUG=webrtc:5260
==========

to

==========
Allow max 1 block per type in RTCP Extended Reports
Design of individual block in ExtendedReports packet suggest there is
no point to have more than one block per type.
This CL reduce complexity of having several blocks of the same type in
same report.

BUG=webrtc:5260
==========

[danilchap, 2016-10-25 08:58:09]

danilchap@webrtc.org changed reviewers:
+ stefan@webrtc.org

[danilchap, 2016-10-25 08:58:56]

Stefan, can you approve a change in /test/

[stefan-webrtc, 2016-10-31 15:10:59]

lgtm

[danilchap, 2016-10-31 15:11:27]

The CQ bit was checked by danilchap@webrtc.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-10-31 15:11:36]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.webrtc.org/...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-10-31 15:40:49]

Description was changed from

==========
Allow max 1 block per type in RTCP Extended Reports
Design of individual block in ExtendedReports packet suggest there is
no point to have more than one block per type.
This CL reduce complexity of having several blocks of the same type in
same report.

BUG=webrtc:5260
==========

to

==========
Allow max 1 block per type in RTCP Extended Reports
Design of individual block in ExtendedReports packet suggest there is
no point to have more than one block per type.
This CL reduce complexity of having several blocks of the same type in
same report.

BUG=webrtc:5260
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-10-31 15:40:50]

Committed patchset #5 (id:180001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-10-31 15:44:28]

Description was changed from

==========
Allow max 1 block per type in RTCP Extended Reports
Design of individual block in ExtendedReports packet suggest there is
no point to have more than one block per type.
This CL reduce complexity of having several blocks of the same type in
same report.

BUG=webrtc:5260
==========

to

==========
Allow max 1 block per type in RTCP Extended Reports
Design of individual block in ExtendedReports packet suggest there is
no point to have more than one block per type.
This CL reduce complexity of having several blocks of the same type in
same report.

BUG=webrtc:5260

Committed: https://crrev.com/80ac24dd36b2df1c0faee5ae490b9a74db9c7464
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#14855}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-10-31 15:44:29]

Patchset 5 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/80ac24dd36b2df1c0faee5ae490b9a74db9c7464
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#14855}