Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3129)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database_unittest.cc

Issue 2281673002: Full hookup of BudgetManager interfaces to BudgetDatabase. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@manager
Patch Set: nits Created 4 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database.cc ('k') | chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_manager.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database_unittest.cc
index f2b67e057f8dd283af87951dfca868706d89f958..09a5728b2bbf48f919dc54714e15106dc814aab0 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database_unittest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database_unittest.cc
@@ -4,7 +4,10 @@
#include "chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database.h"
+#include <vector>
+
#include "base/run_loop.h"
+#include "base/test/histogram_tester.h"
#include "base/test/simple_test_clock.h"
#include "base/threading/thread_task_runner_handle.h"
#include "chrome/browser/budget_service/budget.pb.h"
@@ -14,11 +17,12 @@
#include "components/leveldb_proto/proto_database_impl.h"
#include "content/public/browser/browser_thread.h"
#include "content/public/test/test_browser_thread_bundle.h"
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/bindings/array.h"
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
namespace {
-const double kDefaultExpirationInHours = 72;
+const double kDefaultExpirationInHours = 240;
const double kDefaultEngagement = 30.0;
const char kTestOrigin[] = "https://example.com";
@@ -50,11 +54,10 @@ class BudgetDatabaseTest : public ::testing::Test {
void GetBudgetDetailsComplete(
base::Closure run_loop_closure,
- bool success,
- const BudgetDatabase::BudgetPrediction& prediction) {
- success_ = success;
- // Convert BudgetPrediction to a vector for random access to check values.
- prediction_.assign(prediction.begin(), prediction.end());
+ blink::mojom::BudgetServiceErrorType error,
+ mojo::Array<blink::mojom::BudgetStatePtr> predictions) {
+ success_ = (error == blink::mojom::BudgetServiceErrorType::NONE);
+ prediction_.Swap(&predictions);
run_loop_closure.Run();
}
@@ -83,16 +86,26 @@ class BudgetDatabaseTest : public ::testing::Test {
}
protected:
+ base::HistogramTester* GetHistogramTester() { return &histogram_tester_; }
bool success_;
- std::vector<BudgetDatabase::BudgetStatus> prediction_;
+ mojo::Array<blink::mojom::BudgetStatePtr> prediction_;
private:
content::TestBrowserThreadBundle thread_bundle_;
std::unique_ptr<budget_service::Budget> budget_;
TestingProfile profile_;
BudgetDatabase db_;
+ base::HistogramTester histogram_tester_;
};
+TEST_F(BudgetDatabaseTest, GetBudgetNoBudgetOrSES) {
+ const GURL origin(kTestOrigin);
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+ ASSERT_TRUE(success_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(2U, prediction_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, prediction_[0]->budget_at);
+}
+
TEST_F(BudgetDatabaseTest, AddEngagementBudgetTest) {
const GURL origin(kTestOrigin);
base::SimpleTestClock* clock = SetClockForTesting();
@@ -106,33 +119,36 @@ TEST_F(BudgetDatabaseTest, AddEngagementBudgetTest) {
GetBudgetDetails();
ASSERT_TRUE(success_);
ASSERT_EQ(2U, prediction_.size());
- ASSERT_EQ(kDefaultEngagement, prediction_[0].budget_at);
- ASSERT_EQ(0, prediction_[1].budget_at);
- ASSERT_EQ(expiration_time, prediction_[1].time);
+ ASSERT_EQ(kDefaultEngagement, prediction_[0]->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, prediction_[1]->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_EQ(expiration_time.ToDoubleT(), prediction_[1]->time);
// Advance time 1 day and add more engagement budget.
clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromDays(1));
GetBudgetDetails();
- // The budget should now have 1 full share plus 1/3 share.
+ // The budget should now have 1 full share plus 1 daily budget.
ASSERT_TRUE(success_);
ASSERT_EQ(3U, prediction_.size());
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement * 4 / 3, prediction_[0].budget_at);
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement * 1 / 3, prediction_[1].budget_at);
- ASSERT_EQ(expiration_time, prediction_[1].time);
- ASSERT_EQ(0, prediction_[2].budget_at);
- ASSERT_EQ(expiration_time + base::TimeDelta::FromDays(1),
- prediction_[2].time);
+ double daily_budget = kDefaultEngagement * 24 / kDefaultExpirationInHours;
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement + daily_budget,
+ prediction_[0]->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(daily_budget, prediction_[1]->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_EQ(expiration_time.ToDoubleT(), prediction_[1]->time);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, prediction_[2]->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_EQ((expiration_time + base::TimeDelta::FromDays(1)).ToDoubleT(),
+ prediction_[2]->time);
// Advance time by 59 minutes and check that no engagement budget is added
// since budget should only be added for > 1 hour increments.
clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromMinutes(59));
+ GetBudgetDetails();
// The budget should be the same as before the attempted add.
- GetBudgetDetails();
ASSERT_TRUE(success_);
ASSERT_EQ(3U, prediction_.size());
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement * 4 / 3, prediction_[0].budget_at);
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement + daily_budget,
+ prediction_[0]->budget_at);
}
TEST_F(BudgetDatabaseTest, SpendBudgetTest) {
@@ -156,29 +172,143 @@ TEST_F(BudgetDatabaseTest, SpendBudgetTest) {
// There should still be three chunks of budget of size kDefaultEngagement-1,
// kDefaultEngagement, and kDefaultEngagement.
ASSERT_EQ(4U, prediction_.size());
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement * 5 / 3 - 1, prediction_[0].budget_at);
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement * 2 / 3, prediction_[1].budget_at);
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement * 1 / 3, prediction_[2].budget_at);
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(0, prediction_[3].budget_at);
+ double daily_budget = kDefaultEngagement * 24 / kDefaultExpirationInHours;
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement + 2 * daily_budget - 1,
+ prediction_[0]->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(daily_budget * 2, prediction_[1]->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(daily_budget, prediction_[2]->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(0, prediction_[3]->budget_at);
// Now spend enough that it will use up the rest of the first chunk and all of
// the second chunk, but not all of the third chunk.
- ASSERT_TRUE(SpendBudget(origin, kDefaultEngagement * 4 / 3));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(SpendBudget(origin, kDefaultEngagement + daily_budget));
GetBudgetDetails();
ASSERT_EQ(2U, prediction_.size());
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement * 1 / 3 - 1,
- prediction_.begin()->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(daily_budget - 1, prediction_[0]->budget_at);
// Validate that the code returns false if SpendBudget tries to spend more
// budget than the origin has.
EXPECT_FALSE(SpendBudget(origin, kDefaultEngagement));
GetBudgetDetails();
ASSERT_EQ(2U, prediction_.size());
- ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(kDefaultEngagement * 1 / 3 - 1,
- prediction_.begin()->budget_at);
+ ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(daily_budget - 1, prediction_[0]->budget_at);
// Advance time until the last remaining chunk should be expired, then query
// for the full engagement worth of budget.
- clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromDays(6));
+ clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromHours(kDefaultExpirationInHours + 1));
EXPECT_TRUE(SpendBudget(origin, kDefaultEngagement));
}
+
+// There are times when a device's clock could move backwards in time, either
+// due to hardware issues or user actions. Test here to make sure that even if
+// time goes backwards and then forwards again, the origin isn't granted extra
+// budget.
+TEST_F(BudgetDatabaseTest, GetBudgetNegativeTime) {
+ const GURL origin(kTestOrigin);
+ base::SimpleTestClock* clock = SetClockForTesting();
+
+ // Set the default site engagement.
+ SetSiteEngagementScore(origin, kDefaultEngagement);
+
+ // Initialize the budget with two chunks.
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+ clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromDays(1));
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+
+ // Save off the budget total.
+ ASSERT_EQ(3U, prediction_.size());
+ double budget = prediction_[0]->budget_at;
+
+ // Move the clock backwards in time to before the budget awards.
+ clock->SetNow(clock->Now() - base::TimeDelta::FromDays(5));
+
+ // Make sure the budget is the same.
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+ ASSERT_EQ(3U, prediction_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(budget, prediction_[0]->budget_at);
+
+ // Now move the clock back to the original time and check that no extra budget
+ // is awarded.
+ clock->SetNow(clock->Now() + base::TimeDelta::FromDays(5));
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+ ASSERT_EQ(3U, prediction_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(budget, prediction_[0]->budget_at);
+}
+
+TEST_F(BudgetDatabaseTest, CheckBackgroundBudgetHistogram) {
+ const GURL origin(kTestOrigin);
+ base::SimpleTestClock* clock = SetClockForTesting();
+
+ // Set the default site engagement.
+ SetSiteEngagementScore(origin, kDefaultEngagement);
+
+ // Initialize the budget with some interesting chunks: 30 budget, 3 budget,
+ // 0 budget, and then after the first two expire, another 30 budget.
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+ clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromDays(2));
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+ clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromMinutes(59));
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+ clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromDays(11));
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+
+ // The BackgroundBudget UMA is recorded when budget is added to the origin.
+ // This can happen a maximum of once per hour so there should be two entries.
+ std::vector<base::Bucket> buckets =
+ GetHistogramTester()->GetAllSamples("PushMessaging.BackgroundBudget");
+ ASSERT_EQ(2U, buckets.size());
+ // First bucket is for 30 budget, which should have 2 entries.
+ EXPECT_EQ(30, buckets[0].min);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, buckets[0].count);
+ // Second bucket is for 36 budget, which should have 1 entry.
+ EXPECT_EQ(36, buckets[1].min);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, buckets[1].count);
+}
+
+TEST_F(BudgetDatabaseTest, CheckEngagementHistograms) {
+ const GURL origin(kTestOrigin);
+ base::SimpleTestClock* clock = SetClockForTesting();
+
+ // Set the engagement to twice the cost of an action.
+ double cost = 2;
+ double engagement = cost * 2;
+ SetSiteEngagementScore(origin, engagement);
+
+ // Get the budget, which will award a chunk of budget equal to engagement.
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+
+ // Now spend the budget to trigger the UMA recording the SES score. The first
+ // call shouldn't write any UMA. The second should write a lowSES entry, and
+ // the third should write a noSES entry.
+ ASSERT_TRUE(SpendBudget(origin, cost));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(SpendBudget(origin, cost));
+ ASSERT_FALSE(SpendBudget(origin, cost));
+
+ // Advance the clock by 12 days (to guarantee a full new engagement grant)
+ // then change the SES score to get a different UMA entry, then spend the
+ // budget again.
+ clock->Advance(base::TimeDelta::FromDays(12));
+ GetBudgetDetails();
+ SetSiteEngagementScore(origin, engagement * 2);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(SpendBudget(origin, cost));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(SpendBudget(origin, cost));
+ ASSERT_FALSE(SpendBudget(origin, cost));
+
+ // Now check the UMA. Both UMA should have 2 buckets with 1 entry each.
+ std::vector<base::Bucket> no_budget_buckets =
+ GetHistogramTester()->GetAllSamples("PushMessaging.SESForNoBudgetOrigin");
+ ASSERT_EQ(2U, no_budget_buckets.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(engagement, no_budget_buckets[0].min);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, no_budget_buckets[0].count);
+ EXPECT_EQ(engagement * 2, no_budget_buckets[1].min);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, no_budget_buckets[1].count);
+
+ std::vector<base::Bucket> low_budget_buckets =
+ GetHistogramTester()->GetAllSamples(
+ "PushMessaging.SESForLowBudgetOrigin");
+ ASSERT_EQ(2U, low_budget_buckets.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(engagement, low_budget_buckets[0].min);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, low_budget_buckets[0].count);
+ EXPECT_EQ(engagement * 2, low_budget_buckets[1].min);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, low_budget_buckets[1].count);
+}
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_database.cc ('k') | chrome/browser/budget_service/budget_manager.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698