Don't simulate probing based on rtc event logs since we don't have that info logged.

webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc

Index: webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc b/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
index c9621f4057c885f0e7dbff348a176246cefff43e..1db7672b9cb01451ffc4d0b54293eede97c82463 100644
--- a/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
+++ b/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
@@ -834,7 +834,8 @@ void EventLogAnalyzer::CreateBweSimulationGraph(Plot* plot) {
       if (rtp.header.extension.hasTransportSequenceNumber) {
         RTC_DCHECK(rtp.header.extension.hasTransportSequenceNumber);
         cc.GetTransportFeedbackObserver()->AddPacket(
-            rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.total_length, 0);
+            rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.total_length,
+            PacketInfo::kNotAProbe);
         rtc::SentPacket sent_packet(
             rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.timestamp / 1000);
         cc.OnSentPacket(sent_packet);