Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1172)

Unified Diff: webrtc/modules/congestion_controller/congestion_controller.cc

Issue 2246403002: CongestionController::SetBweBitrates may now trigger probing. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: webrtc/modules/congestion_controller/congestion_controller.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/modules/congestion_controller/congestion_controller.cc b/webrtc/modules/congestion_controller/congestion_controller.cc
index 88bc9071364ea8f169f957cc9e9d38aa35f3f59e..3ef4c993f44032a7abf7b159deda37da93815b49 100644
--- a/webrtc/modules/congestion_controller/congestion_controller.cc
+++ b/webrtc/modules/congestion_controller/congestion_controller.cc
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ CongestionController::CongestionController(
remote_estimator_proxy_(clock_, packet_router_.get()),
transport_feedback_adapter_(bitrate_controller_.get(), clock_),
min_bitrate_bps_(RemoteBitrateEstimator::kDefaultMinBitrateBps),
+ max_bitrate_bps_(0),
last_reported_bitrate_bps_(0),
last_reported_fraction_loss_(0),
last_reported_rtt_(0),
@@ -200,6 +201,7 @@ CongestionController::CongestionController(
remote_estimator_proxy_(clock_, packet_router_.get()),
transport_feedback_adapter_(bitrate_controller_.get(), clock_),
min_bitrate_bps_(RemoteBitrateEstimator::kDefaultMinBitrateBps),
+ max_bitrate_bps_(0),
last_reported_bitrate_bps_(0),
last_reported_fraction_loss_(0),
last_reported_rtt_(0),
@@ -224,6 +226,16 @@ void CongestionController::SetBweBitrates(int min_bitrate_bps,
min_bitrate_bps,
max_bitrate_bps);
+ {
+ rtc::CritScope cs(&critsect_);
+ if (last_reported_bitrate_bps_ != 0 &&
stefan-webrtc 2016/08/16 11:48:39 Add comment to explain why we don't do this if no
philipel 2016/08/16 13:04:31 Done.
+ last_reported_bitrate_bps_ < static_cast<uint32_t>(max_bitrate_bps) &&
+ max_bitrate_bps_ < max_bitrate_bps) {
stefan-webrtc 2016/08/16 11:48:39 I think it's easier to read if we do max_bitrate_b
philipel 2016/08/16 13:04:31 Done.
+ pacer_->ProbeAtBitrate(max_bitrate_bps, 5);
+ }
+ }
+ max_bitrate_bps_ = max_bitrate_bps;
+
if (remote_bitrate_estimator_)
remote_bitrate_estimator_->SetMinBitrate(min_bitrate_bps);
min_bitrate_bps_ = min_bitrate_bps;
@@ -241,6 +253,7 @@ void CongestionController::ResetBweAndBitrates(int bitrate_bps,
bitrate_controller_->ResetBitrates(bitrate_bps, min_bitrate_bps,
max_bitrate_bps);
min_bitrate_bps_ = min_bitrate_bps;
+ max_bitrate_bps_ = max_bitrate_bps;
// TODO(honghaiz): Recreate this object once the remote bitrate estimator is
// no longer exposed outside CongestionController.
if (remote_bitrate_estimator_)

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698