Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(110)

Issue 2043193003: Make the default value of rtcp-mux policy to required. (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 6 months ago by Zhi Huang
Modified:
4 years ago
CC:
webrtc-reviews_webrtc.org, tterriberry_mozilla.com
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
webrtc
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Make the default value of rtcp-mux policy to required. Change the default value of rtcp-mux policy in RTCConfiguration. Refactor the peerconnectioninterface and webrtcsession unit tests. BUG=webrtc:6030 Committed: https://crrev.com/4dfb8cef514bf030f08d61289543e32127366f12 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#15217}

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Change the java api. #

Total comments: 5

Patch Set 3 : Refactoring the unit tests. #

Patch Set 4 : Merge with new changes. #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+35 lines, -12 lines) Patch
M webrtc/api/android/java/src/org/webrtc/PeerConnection.java View 1 2 3 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface.h View 1 2 3 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 1 comment Download
M webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc View 1 2 3 10 chunks +15 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M webrtc/api/test/testsdpstrings.h View 1 2 2 chunks +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc View 1 2 3 7 chunks +16 lines, -9 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 34 (19 generated)
Zhi Huang
It's a one line change. But we should do some refactoring for the unit tests. ...
4 years, 6 months ago (2016-06-08 17:00:12 UTC) #2
pthatcher1
I think we should also change it here for Java apps: https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/webrtc/api/java/src/org/webrtc/PeerConnection.java?q=rtcpmuxpolicy+require&sq=package:chromium&l=153&dr=C and here for ...
4 years, 6 months ago (2016-06-08 17:17:14 UTC) #3
Zhi Huang
On 2016/06/08 17:17:14, pthatcher1 wrote: > I think we should also change it here for ...
4 years, 6 months ago (2016-06-08 17:19:41 UTC) #4
Zhi Huang
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/20001/webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc File webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc (right): https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/20001/webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc#newcode417 webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc:417: } In the unit test, the default value for ...
4 years, 6 months ago (2016-06-22 00:23:06 UTC) #6
honghaiz3
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/20001/webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc File webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc (right): https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/20001/webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc#newcode606 webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc:606: config.rtcp_mux_policy = PeerConnectionInterface::kRtcpMuxPolicyNegotiate; Is there any reason to set ...
4 years, 6 months ago (2016-06-22 16:58:44 UTC) #7
Taylor Brandstetter
lgtm with one small comment https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/20001/webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc File webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc (right): https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/20001/webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc#newcode3291 webrtc/api/webrtcsession_unittest.cc:3291: PeerConnectionInterface::kRtcpMuxPolicyRequire; If we're passing ...
4 years, 6 months ago (2016-06-22 17:01:10 UTC) #8
Zhi Huang
https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/20001/webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc File webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc (right): https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/20001/webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc#newcode606 webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc:606: config.rtcp_mux_policy = PeerConnectionInterface::kRtcpMuxPolicyNegotiate; On 2016/06/22 16:58:44, honghaiz3 wrote: > ...
4 years, 6 months ago (2016-06-22 21:41:28 UTC) #9
honghaiz3
lgtm
4 years, 6 months ago (2016-06-22 22:27:43 UTC) #10
Zhi Huang
Hi Peter, Can you review this? I've got two lgtms.
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-11 21:36:57 UTC) #12
Zhi Huang
Hi, I have a one-line change in Java api. Please take a look. Thanks.
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-07-27 22:20:58 UTC) #14
Zhi Huang
Hello Alex, I have a one line change in Java code. Please take a look. ...
4 years ago (2016-11-23 05:24:15 UTC) #24
honghaiz3
lgtm https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/60001/webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface.h File webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface.h (right): https://codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/diff/60001/webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface.h#newcode246 webrtc/api/peerconnectioninterface.h:246: rtcp_mux_policy = kRtcpMuxPolicyRequire; As this is the same ...
4 years ago (2016-11-23 17:52:49 UTC) #26
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.webrtc.org/2043193003/60001
4 years ago (2016-11-23 18:18:37 UTC) #29
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #4 (id:60001)
4 years ago (2016-11-23 18:30:17 UTC) #32
commit-bot: I haz the power
4 years ago (2016-11-23 18:30:27 UTC) #34
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 4 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/4dfb8cef514bf030f08d61289543e32127366f12
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#15217}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698