Chromium Code Reviews| Index: webrtc/base/timeutils_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/webrtc/base/timeutils_unittest.cc b/webrtc/base/timeutils_unittest.cc |
| index f183684e6ccf41d3c1e9801ac987da55f7f1426e..fbd27d8ac08164150855b272b3f7c700d2b58cce 100644 |
| --- a/webrtc/base/timeutils_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/webrtc/base/timeutils_unittest.cc |
| @@ -359,24 +359,25 @@ TEST(FakeClock, SettingTimeWakesThreads) { |
| message_handler_dispatched.Set(); |
| }; |
| FunctorMessageHandler<void, decltype(functor)> handler(functor); |
| - worker.PostDelayed(10000, &handler); |
| + worker.PostDelayed(60000, &handler); |
| // Wait for a bit for the worker thread to be started and enter its socket |
| - // select(). |
| + // select(). Otherwise this test would be trivial since the worker thread |
| + // would process the event as soon as it was started. |
| Thread::Current()->SleepMs(1000); |
|
tommi
2016/06/02 07:59:01
A whole second seems like a lot. Can we synchroni
Taylor Brandstetter
2016/06/02 17:19:54
I picked a long time so that it's guaranteed to be
|
| // Advance the fake clock, expecting the worker thread to wake up |
| - // and dispatch the message quickly. |
| - clock.AdvanceTime(TimeDelta::FromSeconds(10u)); |
| - message_handler_dispatched.Wait(Event::kForever); |
| + // and dispatch the message instantly. |
| + clock.AdvanceTime(TimeDelta::FromSeconds(60u)); |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(message_handler_dispatched.Wait(0)); |
| worker.Stop(); |
| SetClock(nullptr); |
| - // The message should have been dispatched long before the 10 seconds fully |
| - // elapsed. |
| + // The message should have been dispatched long before the 60 seconds fully |
| + // elapsed (just a sanity check). |
| int64_t real_end_time_ms = TimeMillis(); |
| - EXPECT_LT(real_end_time_ms - real_start_time_ms, 2000); |
| + EXPECT_LT(real_end_time_ms - real_start_time_ms, 10000); |
| } |
| } // namespace rtc |