Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(571)

Unified Diff: webrtc/p2p/base/portallocator_unittest.cc

Issue 1956453003: Relanding: Implement RTCConfiguration.iceCandidatePoolSize. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: webrtc/p2p/base/portallocator_unittest.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/p2p/base/portallocator_unittest.cc b/webrtc/p2p/base/portallocator_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..489d81945f579880b58c226f88a0a0511abdee9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/webrtc/p2p/base/portallocator_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2016 The WebRTC Project Authors. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
+ * that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
+ * tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
+ * in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
+ * be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
+ */
+
+#include <memory>
+
+#include "webrtc/base/gunit.h"
+#include "webrtc/base/thread.h"
+#include "webrtc/p2p/base/fakeportallocator.h"
+#include "webrtc/p2p/base/portallocator.h"
+
+static const char kContentName[] = "test content";
+// Based on ICE_UFRAG_LENGTH
+static const char kIceUfrag[] = "TESTICEUFRAG0000";
+// Based on ICE_PWD_LENGTH
+static const char kIcePwd[] = "TESTICEPWD00000000000000";
+static const char kTurnUsername[] = "test";
+static const char kTurnPassword[] = "test";
+
+class PortAllocatorTest : public testing::Test, public sigslot::has_slots<> {
+ public:
+ PortAllocatorTest() {
+ allocator_.reset(
+ new cricket::FakePortAllocator(rtc::Thread::Current(), nullptr));
+ }
+
+ protected:
+ void SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(int candidate_pool_size) {
+ allocator_->SetConfiguration(cricket::ServerAddresses(),
+ std::vector<cricket::RelayServerConfig>(),
+ candidate_pool_size);
+ }
+
+ const cricket::FakePortAllocatorSession* PeekPooledSession() const {
+ return static_cast<const cricket::FakePortAllocatorSession*>(
+ allocator_->PeekPooledSession());
+ }
+
+ std::unique_ptr<cricket::FakePortAllocatorSession> GetPooledSession() {
+ return std::unique_ptr<cricket::FakePortAllocatorSession>(
+ static_cast<cricket::FakePortAllocatorSession*>(
+ allocator_->GetPooledSession(kContentName, 0, kIceUfrag, kIcePwd)));
+ }
+
+ // Should only be called at the end of a test as it clears the sessions.
+ bool HasExactlyNPooledSessions(int num_sessions) {
pthatcher1 2016/05/05 21:51:25 Why not call this TakeAllPooledSessions() and have
Taylor Brandstetter 2016/05/06 03:53:35 Good idea, done.
+ while (num_sessions > 0) {
+ auto session = GetPooledSession();
+ if (!session.get()) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ --num_sessions;
+ }
+ if (PeekPooledSession()) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ std::unique_ptr<cricket::FakePortAllocator> allocator_;
+ rtc::SocketAddress stun_server_1{"11.11.11.11", 3478};
+ rtc::SocketAddress stun_server_2{"22.22.22.22", 3478};
+ cricket::RelayServerConfig turn_server_1{"11.11.11.11", 3478,
+ kTurnUsername, kTurnPassword,
+ cricket::PROTO_UDP, false};
+ cricket::RelayServerConfig turn_server_2{"22.22.22.22", 3478,
+ kTurnUsername, kTurnPassword,
+ cricket::PROTO_UDP, false};
+};
+
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, TestDefaults) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0UL, allocator_->stun_servers().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0UL, allocator_->turn_servers().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, allocator_->candidate_pool_size());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(HasExactlyNPooledSessions(0));
+}
+
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, SetConfigurationUpdatesIceServers) {
+ cricket::ServerAddresses stun_servers_1 = {stun_server_1};
+ std::vector<cricket::RelayServerConfig> turn_servers_1 = {turn_server_1};
+ allocator_->SetConfiguration(stun_servers_1, turn_servers_1, 0);
+ EXPECT_EQ(stun_servers_1, allocator_->stun_servers());
+ EXPECT_EQ(turn_servers_1, allocator_->turn_servers());
+
+ // Update with a different set of servers.
+ cricket::ServerAddresses stun_servers_2 = {stun_server_2};
+ std::vector<cricket::RelayServerConfig> turn_servers_2 = {turn_server_2};
+ allocator_->SetConfiguration(stun_servers_2, turn_servers_2, 0);
+ EXPECT_EQ(stun_servers_2, allocator_->stun_servers());
+ EXPECT_EQ(turn_servers_2, allocator_->turn_servers());
+}
+
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, SetConfigurationUpdatesCandidatePoolSize) {
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(2);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, allocator_->candidate_pool_size());
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(3);
+ EXPECT_EQ(3, allocator_->candidate_pool_size());
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, allocator_->candidate_pool_size());
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(4);
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, allocator_->candidate_pool_size());
+}
+
+// A negative pool size should just be treated as zero.
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, SetConfigurationWithNegativePoolSizeDoesntCrash) {
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(-1);
pthatcher1 2016/05/05 21:51:25 Are you going to verify something here?
Taylor Brandstetter 2016/05/06 03:53:35 Just that it "DoesntCrash" (see test name).
pthatcher1 2016/05/07 00:21:44 Ah. I missed that. Perhaps just a comment like s
Taylor Brandstetter 2016/05/09 22:07:10 Done.
+}
+
+// Test that if the candidate pool size is nonzero, pooled sessions are
+// created, and StartGettingPorts is called on them.
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, SetConfigurationCreatesPooledSessions) {
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(2);
+ auto session_1 = GetPooledSession();
+ auto session_2 = GetPooledSession();
+ ASSERT_NE(nullptr, session_1.get());
+ ASSERT_NE(nullptr, session_2.get());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, session_1->port_config_count());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, session_2->port_config_count());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(HasExactlyNPooledSessions(0));
+}
+
+// Test that if the candidate pool size is increased, pooled sessions are
+// created as necessary.
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, SetConfigurationCreatesMorePooledSessions) {
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(1);
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(2);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(HasExactlyNPooledSessions(2));
+}
+
+// Test that if the candidate pool size is reduced, extra sessions are
+// destroyed.
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, SetConfigurationDestroysPooledSessions) {
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(2);
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(HasExactlyNPooledSessions(1));
+}
+
+// Test that if the candidate pool size is reduced and increased, but reducing
+// didn't actually destroy any sessions (because they were already given away),
+// increasing the size to its initial value doesn't create a new session.
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, SetConfigurationDoesntCreateExtraSessions) {
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(1);
+ GetPooledSession();
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(0);
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(HasExactlyNPooledSessions(0));
+}
+
+// According to JSEP, exising pooled sessions should be destroyed and new
+// ones created when the ICE servers change.
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest,
+ SetConfigurationRecreatesPooledSessionsWhenIceServersChange) {
+ cricket::ServerAddresses stun_servers_1 = {stun_server_1};
+ std::vector<cricket::RelayServerConfig> turn_servers_1 = {turn_server_1};
+ allocator_->SetConfiguration(stun_servers_1, turn_servers_1, 1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(stun_servers_1, allocator_->stun_servers());
+ EXPECT_EQ(turn_servers_1, allocator_->turn_servers());
+
+ // Update with a different set of servers (and also change pool size).
+ cricket::ServerAddresses stun_servers_2 = {stun_server_2};
+ std::vector<cricket::RelayServerConfig> turn_servers_2 = {turn_server_2};
+ allocator_->SetConfiguration(stun_servers_2, turn_servers_2, 2);
+ EXPECT_EQ(stun_servers_2, allocator_->stun_servers());
+ EXPECT_EQ(turn_servers_2, allocator_->turn_servers());
+ auto session_1 = GetPooledSession();
+ auto session_2 = GetPooledSession();
+ ASSERT_NE(nullptr, session_1.get());
+ ASSERT_NE(nullptr, session_2.get());
+ EXPECT_EQ(stun_servers_2, session_1->stun_servers());
+ EXPECT_EQ(turn_servers_2, session_1->turn_servers());
+ EXPECT_EQ(stun_servers_2, session_2->stun_servers());
+ EXPECT_EQ(turn_servers_2, session_2->turn_servers());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(HasExactlyNPooledSessions(0));
+}
+
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, PeekPooledSessionReturnsNextSession) {
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(2);
+ auto peeked_session_1 = PeekPooledSession();
+ auto session_1 = GetPooledSession();
+ EXPECT_EQ(session_1.get(), peeked_session_1);
+ auto peeked_session_2 = PeekPooledSession();
+ auto session_2 = GetPooledSession();
+ EXPECT_EQ(session_2.get(), peeked_session_2);
+}
+
+// Verify that subclasses of PortAllocatorSession are given a chance to update
+// transport info when GetPooledSession is called, and the base class updates
+// the info itself.
+TEST_F(PortAllocatorTest, GetPooledSessionUpdatesTransportInfo) {
+ SetConfigurationWithPoolSize(1);
+ auto peeked_session = PeekPooledSession();
+ ASSERT_NE(nullptr, peeked_session);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, peeked_session->transport_info_updates());
+ std::unique_ptr<cricket::FakePortAllocatorSession> session(
+ static_cast<cricket::FakePortAllocatorSession*>(
+ allocator_->GetPooledSession(kContentName, 1, kIceUfrag, kIcePwd)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, session->transport_info_updates());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kContentName, session->content_name());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, session->component());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kIceUfrag, session->ice_ufrag());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kIcePwd, session->ice_pwd());
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698