Move InitToBlack and Reset methods from cricket::VideoFrame to its subclass cricket::WebRtcVideoFra…

webrtc/media/base/videoframe_unittest.h

Index: webrtc/media/base/videoframe_unittest.h
diff --git a/webrtc/media/base/videoframe_unittest.h b/webrtc/media/base/videoframe_unittest.h
index 88119fd672f14e0776f0dbd35d5773dee0fc0e40..18bcc7d5cf771c5368a401c029e3b22980cb9e7f 100644
--- a/webrtc/media/base/videoframe_unittest.h
+++ b/webrtc/media/base/videoframe_unittest.h
@@ -1372,6 +1372,10 @@ class VideoFrameTest : public testing::Test {
     }
   }
 
+  // TODO(nisse): Reset is no longer a public method, and not

[perkj_webrtc, 2016/03/24 09:53:00]

Take a look and advice please. 
You can probably make an init test out of this.

[nisse-webrtc, 2016/03/24 10:03:14]

Only problem is that the Init-method to test takes a CapturedFrame as input. I
can do that, question is if it is needed, or if we have other tests calling
Init(CapturedFrame, ... ) with various values of rotation and apply_rotation.

+  // available here. It is used by the two Init methods. Do we have
+  // adequate tests form WebRtcVideoFrame::Init?
+#if 0
   // Tests re-initing an existing image.
   void Reset(webrtc::VideoRotation rotation, bool apply_rotation) {
     T frame1, frame2;
@@ -1413,6 +1417,7 @@ class VideoFrameTest : public testing::Test {
   void ResetAndDontApplyRotation() {
     Reset(webrtc::kVideoRotation_90, false);
   }
+#endif
 
   //////////////////////
   // Conversion tests //