Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(567)

Unified Diff: webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc

Issue 1715673002: Implement the NackModule as part of the new jitter buffer. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master
Patch Set: Implemented reordering statistics in separate class. Created 4 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc b/webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ada0d012fefd6642fff44e879f115f716e83fb71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 The WebRTC project authors. All Rights Reserved.
+ *
+ * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
+ * that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
+ * tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
+ * in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
+ * be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
+ */
+
+#include <algorithm>
+#include <limits>
+
+#include "webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.h"
+
+#include "webrtc/base/checks.h"
+#include "webrtc/base/mod_ops.h"
+#include "webrtc/modules/utility/include/process_thread.h"
+
+namespace webrtc {
+
+namespace {
+ const int kMaxPacketAge = 10000;
+ const int kMaxNackPackets = 1000;
+ const int kDefaultRttMs = 100;
+ const int kMaxNackRetries = 10;
+ const int kProcessFrequency = 50;
+ const int kProcessIntervalMs = 1000 / kProcessFrequency;
+ const int kMaxReorderedPackets = 128;
+ const int kNumReorderingBuckets = 10;
+} // namespace
+
+NackModule::NackInfo::NackInfo()
+ : seq_num(0), send_at_seq_num(0), sent_at_time(-1), retries(0) {}
+
+NackModule::NackInfo::NackInfo(uint16_t seq_num, uint16_t send_at_seq_num)
+ : seq_num(seq_num),
+ send_at_seq_num(send_at_seq_num),
+ sent_at_time(-1),
+ retries(0) {}
+
+NackModule::NackModule(Clock* clock,
+ VCMNackSender* nack_sender,
+ VCMKeyFrameRequestSender* keyframe_request_sender)
+ : clock_(clock),
+ nack_sender_(nack_sender),
+ keyframe_request_sender_(keyframe_request_sender),
+ reordering_distribution_(kNumReorderingBuckets, kMaxReorderedPackets),
+ running_(true),
+ initialized_(false),
+ rtt_ms_(kDefaultRttMs),
+ last_seq_num_(0),
+ next_process_time_ms_(-1) {
+ RTC_DCHECK(clock_);
+ RTC_DCHECK(nack_sender_);
+ RTC_DCHECK(keyframe_request_sender_);
+}
+
+void NackModule::OnReceivedPacket(const VCMPacket& packet) {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ if (!running_)
+ return;
+ uint16_t seq_num = packet.seqNum;
+ // TODO(philipel): When the packet includes information whether it is
+ // retransmitted or not, use that value instead. For
+ // now set it to true, which will cause the reordering
+ // statistics to never be updated.
+ bool is_retransmitted = true;
+ bool is_keyframe = packet.isFirstPacket && packet.frameType == kVideoFrameKey;
+
+ if (!initialized_) {
+ last_seq_num_ = seq_num;
+ if (is_keyframe) keyframe_list_.emplace(seq_num);
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:10 Is there a reason for doing emplace rather than in
philipel 2016/03/01 10:27:06 Good habit since emplace does the same thing as in
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 12:16:34 Acknowledged.
+ initialized_ = true;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (seq_num == last_seq_num_)
+ return;
+
+ if (AheadOf(last_seq_num_, seq_num)) {
+ // An out of order packet has been received.
+ RemovePacketFromNack(seq_num);
+ if (!is_retransmitted)
+ UpdateReorderingStatistics(seq_num);
+ return;
+ } else {
+ AddPacketsToNack(last_seq_num_ + 1, seq_num);
+ last_seq_num_ = seq_num;
+
+ // Keep track of new keyframes.
+ if (is_keyframe)
+ keyframe_list_.emplace(seq_num);
+
+ // And remove old ones so we don't accumulate keyframes.
+ auto it = keyframe_list_.lower_bound(seq_num - kMaxPacketAge);
+ if (it != keyframe_list_.begin())
+ keyframe_list_.erase(keyframe_list_.begin(), it);
+
+ // Are there any nacks that are waiting for this seq_num.
+ std::vector<uint16_t> nack_batch = GetNackBatch(kSeqNumOnly);
+ if (!nack_batch.empty())
+ nack_sender_->SendNack(nack_batch.data(), nack_batch.size());
+ }
+}
+
+void NackModule::ClearUpTo(uint16_t seq_num) {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ nack_list_.erase(nack_list_.begin(),
+ nack_list_.lower_bound(seq_num));
+ keyframe_list_.erase(keyframe_list_.begin(),
+ keyframe_list_.lower_bound(seq_num));
+}
+
+void NackModule::UpdateRtt(int64_t rtt_ms) {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ rtt_ms_ = rtt_ms;
+}
+
+void NackModule::Stop() {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ running_ = false;
+}
+
+int64_t NackModule::TimeUntilNextProcess() {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ return std::max(next_process_time_ms_ - clock_->TimeInMilliseconds(), 0l);
+}
+
+int32_t NackModule::Process() {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ if (!running_)
+ return 0;
+
+ // Update the next_process_time_ms_ in intervals to achieve
+ // the targeted frequency over time. Also add multiple intervals
+ // in case of a skip in time as to not make uneccessary
+ // calls to Process in order to catch up.
+ int64_t now_ms = clock_->TimeInMilliseconds();
+ if (next_process_time_ms_ == -1) {
+ next_process_time_ms_ = now_ms + kProcessIntervalMs;
+ } else {
+ next_process_time_ms_ = next_process_time_ms_ +
+ kProcessIntervalMs +
+ (now_ms - next_process_time_ms_) /
+ kProcessIntervalMs * kProcessIntervalMs;
+ }
+
+ std::vector<uint16_t> nack_batch = GetNackBatch(kTimeOnly);
+ if (!nack_batch.empty() && nack_sender_ != nullptr)
+ nack_sender_->SendNack(nack_batch.data(), nack_batch.size());
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+bool NackModule::RemovePacketsUntilKeyframe() {
+ while (!keyframe_list_.empty()) {
+ auto it = nack_list_.lower_bound(*keyframe_list_.begin());
+
+ // If this keyframe is so old it does not remove any
+ // packets from the list, remove if from the list of
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:10 "remove *it* from the list"
philipel 2016/03/01 10:27:06 Done.
+ // keyframes and try the next keyframe.
+ if (it == nack_list_.begin()) {
+ keyframe_list_.erase(keyframe_list_.begin());
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ // We have found a keyframe that actually is newer than
+ // atleast one packet in the nack list.
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:10 at least
philipel 2016/03/01 10:27:06 Done.
+ nack_list_.erase(nack_list_.begin(), it);
+ return true;
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:10 I'd prefer to change the structure of this loop a
philipel 2016/03/01 10:27:06 Done.
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+void NackModule::AddPacketsToNack(uint16_t seq_num_start,
+ uint16_t seq_num_end) {
+ // Remove old packets.
+ auto it = nack_list_.lower_bound(seq_num_end - kMaxPacketAge);
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:10 We've been talking about adding support for a time
philipel 2016/03/01 10:27:06 It is something we can implement later on, I don't
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 12:16:34 Sounds good.
+ nack_list_.erase(nack_list_.begin(), it);
+
+ // If the nack list is too large, remove packets from the nack list until
+ // the latest first packet of a keyframe. If the list is still too large,
+ // clear it and request a keyframe.
+ uint16_t num_new_nacks = ForwardDiff(seq_num_start, seq_num_end);
+ if (nack_list_.size() + num_new_nacks > kMaxNackPackets) {
+ while (RemovePacketsUntilKeyframe() &&
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:10 Search and replace Keyframe -> KeyFrame
philipel 2016/03/01 10:27:06 Done.
+ nack_list_.size() + num_new_nacks > kMaxNackPackets) {}
+
+ if (nack_list_.size() + num_new_nacks > kMaxNackPackets) {
+ nack_list_.clear();
+ keyframe_request_sender_->RequestKeyFrame();
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (uint16_t seq_num = seq_num_start; seq_num != seq_num_end; ++seq_num) {
+ NackInfo nack_info(seq_num, seq_num + WaitNumberOfPackets(0.5));
+ RTC_DCHECK(nack_list_.find(seq_num) == nack_list_.end());
+ nack_list_[seq_num] = nack_info;
+ }
+}
+
+void NackModule::RemovePacketFromNack(uint16_t seq_num) {
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:10 Maybe remove this method now that it's trivial?
philipel 2016/03/01 10:27:06 Done.
+ nack_list_.erase(seq_num);
+}
+
+std::vector<uint16_t> NackModule::GetNackBatch(NackFilterOptions options) {
+ bool consider_seq_num = options != kTimeOnly;
+ bool consider_timestamp = options != kSeqNumOnly;
+ int64_t now_ms = clock_->TimeInMilliseconds();
+ std::vector<uint16_t> nack_batch;
+ auto it = nack_list_.begin();
+ while (it != nack_list_.end()) {
+ if (consider_seq_num &&
+ it->second.sent_at_time == -1 &&
+ AheadOrAt(last_seq_num_, it->second.send_at_seq_num)) {
+ nack_batch.emplace_back(it->second.seq_num);
+ ++it->second.retries;
+ it->second.sent_at_time = now_ms;
+ if (it->second.retries >= kMaxNackRetries) {
+ it = nack_list_.erase(it);
+ } else {
+ ++it;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (consider_timestamp &&
+ it->second.sent_at_time + rtt_ms_ <= now_ms) {
+ nack_batch.emplace_back(it->second.seq_num);
+ ++it->second.retries;
+ it->second.sent_at_time = now_ms;
+ if (it->second.retries >= kMaxNackRetries) {
+ it = nack_list_.erase(it);
+ } else {
+ ++it;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+ ++it;
+ }
+ return nack_batch;
+}
+
+void NackModule::UpdateReorderingStatistics(uint16_t seq_num) {
+ RTC_DCHECK(AheadOf(last_seq_num_, seq_num));
+ uint16_t diff = ReverseDiff(last_seq_num_, seq_num);
+ reordering_distribution_.AddValue(diff);
+}
+
+int NackModule::WaitNumberOfPackets(float probability) const {
+ if (reordering_distribution_.NumValues() == 0)
+ return 0;
+ return reordering_distribution_.InverseCDF(probability);
+}
+
+} // namespace webrtc

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698