Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(810)

Unified Diff: webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc

Issue 1715673002: Implement the NackModule as part of the new jitter buffer. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master
Patch Set: Feedback fixes. Created 4 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc b/webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab72b7e73a8c7c242d955877ac62e06f20a61d3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 The WebRTC project authors. All Rights Reserved.
+ *
+ * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
+ * that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
+ * tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
+ * in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
+ * be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
+ */
+
+#include <algorithm>
+#include <limits>
+
+#include "webrtc/base/checks.h"
+#include "webrtc/base/mod_ops.h"
+#include "webrtc/modules/video_coding/nack_module.h"
+#include "webrtc/modules/utility/include/process_thread.h"
+
+namespace webrtc {
+
+NackModule::NackInfo::NackInfo()
+ : seq_num(0), send_at_seq_num(0), send_at_time(0), retries(0) {}
+
+NackModule::NackInfo::NackInfo(uint16_t seq_num, uint16_t send_at_seq_num)
+ : seq_num(seq_num),
+ send_at_seq_num(send_at_seq_num),
+ send_at_time(0),
+ retries(0) {}
+
+NackModule::NackModule(Clock* clock,
+ VCMNackSender* nack_sender,
+ VCMKeyFrameRequestSender* keyframe_request_sender)
+ : clock_(clock),
+ nack_sender_(nack_sender),
+ keyframe_request_sender_(keyframe_request_sender),
+ running_(true),
+ initialized_(false),
+ rtt_ms_(kDefaultRttMs),
+ last_seq_num_(0),
+ last_process_time_ms_(-1),
+ reordering_count_(0) {
+ memset(reordering_occurences_, -1, sizeof(reordering_occurences_));
+ memset(reordering_buckets_, 0, sizeof(reordering_buckets_));
+ RTC_DCHECK(clock_);
+ RTC_DCHECK(nack_sender_);
+ RTC_DCHECK(keyframe_request_sender_);
+}
+
+void NackModule::OnReceivedPacket(const VCMPacket& packet) {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ if (!running_)
+ return;
+ uint16_t seq_num = packet.seqNum;
+ // TODO(philipel): When the packet includes information whether it is
+ // retransmitted or not, use that value instead. For
+ // now set it to true, which will cause the reordering
+ // statistics to never be updated.
+ bool is_retransmitted = true;
+ bool is_keyframe = packet.isFirstPacket && packet.frameType == kVideoFrameKey;
+
+ if (!initialized_) {
+ last_seq_num_ = seq_num;
+ if (is_keyframe) seq_num_keyframes_.emplace(unwrapper_.Unwrap(seq_num));
stefan-webrtc 2016/02/26 09:26:55 Maybe we should be unwrapping all sequence numbers
philipel 2016/02/26 15:12:07 Implemented custom comparator.
+ initialized_ = true;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (seq_num == last_seq_num_)
+ return;
+
+ if (AheadOf(seq_num, last_seq_num_)) {
+ AddPacketsToNack(last_seq_num_ + 1, seq_num);
+ last_seq_num_ = seq_num;
+
+ int64_t seq_num_unwrapped = unwrapper_.Unwrap(seq_num);
+
+ // Keep track of new keyframes.
+ if (is_keyframe)
+ seq_num_keyframes_.emplace(seq_num_unwrapped);
+
+ // And remove old ones so we don't accumulate keyframes.
+ auto it = seq_num_keyframes_.lower_bound(seq_num_unwrapped -
+ kMaxNackPackets);
+ if (it != seq_num_keyframes_.begin())
+ seq_num_keyframes_.erase(seq_num_keyframes_.begin(), it);
+
+ // Are there any nacks that are waiting for this seq_num.
+ std::vector<uint16_t> nack_batch = GetNackBatch(kSeqNumOnly);
+ if (!nack_batch.empty())
+ nack_sender_->SendNack(nack_batch.data(), nack_batch.size());
stefan-webrtc 2016/02/26 09:26:55 Is there any risk that we end up deadlocking here?
philipel 2016/02/26 15:12:07 I have not experienced any deadlocks when testing
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:09 Acknowledged.
+ } else {
+ // An out of order packet has been received.
+ RemovePacketFromNack(seq_num);
+ if (!is_retransmitted)
+ UpdateReorderingStatistics(seq_num);
+ }
stefan-webrtc 2016/02/26 09:26:55 move the else to line 70 and make an early return:
philipel 2016/02/26 15:12:06 Done.
+}
+
+void NackModule::UpdateRtt(int64_t rtt_ms) {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ rtt_ms_ = rtt_ms;
+}
+
+void NackModule::Stop() {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ running_ = false;
+}
+
+int64_t NackModule::TimeUntilNextProcess() {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ return std::max(
+ last_process_time_ms_ +
+ kProcessIntervalMs -
+ clock_->TimeInMilliseconds(),
+ 0l);
stefan-webrtc 2016/02/26 09:26:55 0ll is what you want, I think? Or just do 0 as I t
philipel 2016/02/26 15:12:07 Compiler complains if I use 0ll :)
stefan-webrtc 2016/03/01 08:52:09 Acknowledged.
+}
+
+int32_t NackModule::Process() {
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ if (!running_)
+ return 0;
+
+ // Update the last_process_time_ms_ in intervals to achieve
+ // the targeted frequency over time. Also add multiple intervals
+ // in case of a skip in time as to not make uneccessary
+ // calls to Process in order to catch up.
+ int64_t now_ms = clock_->TimeInMilliseconds();
+ if (last_process_time_ms_ == 0) {
+ last_process_time_ms_ = now_ms + kProcessIntervalMs;
+ } else {
+ last_process_time_ms_ = last_process_time_ms_ +
+ kProcessIntervalMs +
+ (now_ms - 1 - last_process_time_ms_) /
+ kProcessIntervalMs * kProcessIntervalMs;
+ }
+
+ std::vector<uint16_t> nack_batch = GetNackBatch(kTimeOnly);
+ if (!nack_batch.empty() && nack_sender_ != nullptr)
+ nack_sender_->SendNack(nack_batch.data(), nack_batch.size());
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+bool NackModule::RemovePacketsUntilKeyframe() {
+ while (!seq_num_keyframes_.empty()) {
+ int64_t kf_unwrapped_seq_num = *seq_num_keyframes_.begin();
+ auto it = nack_list_.lower_bound(kf_unwrapped_seq_num);
+
+ // If this keyframe is so old it does not remove any
+ // packets from the list, remove if from the list of
+ // keyframes and try the next keyframe.
+ if (it == nack_list_.begin()) {
+ seq_num_keyframes_.erase(seq_num_keyframes_.begin());
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ // We have found a keyframe that actually is newer than
+ // atleast one packet in the nack list.
+ nack_list_.erase(nack_list_.begin(), it);
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+void NackModule::AddPacketsToNack(uint16_t seq_num_start,
+ uint16_t seq_num_end) {
+ // If the nack list is too large, remove packets from the nack list until
+ // the latest first packet of a keyframe. If the list is still too large,
+ // clear it and request a keyframe.
+ uint16_t num_new_nacks = ForwardDiff(seq_num_start, seq_num_end);
+ if (nack_list_.size() + num_new_nacks > kMaxNackPackets) {
+ while (RemovePacketsUntilKeyframe() &&
+ nack_list_.size() + num_new_nacks > kMaxNackPackets) {}
+
+ if (nack_list_.size() + num_new_nacks > kMaxNackPackets) {
+ nack_list_.clear();
+ keyframe_request_sender_->RequestKeyFrame();
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (uint16_t seq_num = seq_num_start; seq_num != seq_num_end; ++seq_num) {
+ NackInfo nack_info(seq_num, seq_num + WaitNumberOfPackets(0.5));
+ int64_t seq_num_unwrapped = unwrapper_.Unwrap(seq_num);
+ nack_list_[seq_num_unwrapped] = nack_info;
+ }
+}
+
+void NackModule::RemovePacketFromNack(uint16_t seq_num) {
+ int64_t seq_num_unwrapped = unwrapper_.Unwrap(seq_num);
+ nack_list_.erase(seq_num_unwrapped);
+}
+
+std::vector<uint16_t> NackModule::GetNackBatch(NackFilterOptions options) {
+ bool consider_seq_num = options != kTimeOnly;
+ bool consider_timestamp = options != kSeqNumOnly;
+ int64_t now_ms = clock_->TimeInMilliseconds();
+ std::vector<uint16_t> nack_batch;
+ auto it = nack_list_.begin();
+ while (it != nack_list_.end()) {
+ if (consider_seq_num && it->second.send_at_time == 0 &&
+ AheadOrAt(last_seq_num_, it->second.send_at_seq_num)) {
+ nack_batch.emplace_back(it->second.seq_num);
+ ++it->second.retries;
+ it->second.send_at_time = now_ms + rtt_ms_;
+ if (it->second.retries >= kMaxNackRetries) {
+ it = nack_list_.erase(it);
+ } else {
+ ++it;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (consider_timestamp && it->second.send_at_time > 0 &&
+ it->second.send_at_time <= now_ms) {
+ nack_batch.emplace_back(it->second.seq_num);
+ ++it->second.retries;
+ it->second.send_at_time = now_ms + rtt_ms_;
+ if (it->second.retries >= kMaxNackRetries) {
+ it = nack_list_.erase(it);
+ } else {
+ ++it;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+ ++it;
+ }
+ return nack_batch;
+}
+
+void NackModule::UpdateReorderingStatistics(uint16_t seq_num) {
+ RTC_DCHECK(AheadOf(last_seq_num_, seq_num));
+
+ int remove_from_bucket = reordering_occurences_[reordering_index_];
+ if (remove_from_bucket != -1)
+ reordering_buckets_[remove_from_bucket] -= 1;
+
+ uint16_t diff = ReverseDiff(last_seq_num_, seq_num);
+ uint16_t add_to_bucket =
+ std::min(static_cast<uint16_t>(kNumReorderingBuckets - 1),
+ static_cast<uint16_t>(diff - 1));
+ reordering_buckets_[add_to_bucket] += 1;
+ if (reordering_occurences_[reordering_index_] == -1)
+ ++reordering_count_;
+ reordering_occurences_[reordering_index_] = add_to_bucket;
+ reordering_index_ = Add<kMaxReorderedPackets>(reordering_index_, 1);
+}
+
+int NackModule::WaitNumberOfPackets(float probability) const {
+ RTC_DCHECK_GE(probability, 0.f);
+ RTC_DCHECK_LE(probability, 1.f);
+
+ // Until there are enough values we default to 0. Also
+ // protect against divide by zero later in the code.
+ if (reordering_count_ < 20)
+ return 0;
+
+ int bucket = 0;
+ float accumulated_probability = 0;
+ while (accumulated_probability < probability &&
+ bucket < kNumReorderingBuckets) {
+ accumulated_probability +=
+ static_cast<float>(reordering_buckets_[bucket]) / reordering_count_;
+ ++bucket;
+ }
+ return bucket + 1;
+}
+
+} // namespace webrtc

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698