Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1127)

Unified Diff: talk/media/base/videosourcebase.h

Issue 1655793003: Make cricket::VideoCapturer implement VideoSourceInterface (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master
Patch Set: Fixed Android Created 4 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: talk/media/base/videosourcebase.h
diff --git a/talk/media/base/videorenderer.h b/talk/media/base/videosourcebase.h
similarity index 57%
copy from talk/media/base/videorenderer.h
copy to talk/media/base/videosourcebase.h
index 9771c492d65dfe7a0e9370f1631e10e3bf1c4722..d1ba339715ad7fe7c856405cebc643a2363b95d3 100644
--- a/talk/media/base/videorenderer.h
+++ b/talk/media/base/videosourcebase.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/*
* libjingle
- * Copyright 2004 Google Inc.
+ * Copyright 2016 Google Inc.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
@@ -25,28 +25,39 @@
* ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
-#ifndef TALK_MEDIA_BASE_VIDEORENDERER_H_
-#define TALK_MEDIA_BASE_VIDEORENDERER_H_
+#ifndef TALK_MEDIA_BASE_VIDEOSOURCEBASE_H_
+#define TALK_MEDIA_BASE_VIDEOSOURCEBASE_H_
-#include "webrtc/media/base/videosinkinterface.h"
+#include <unordered_set>
-namespace cricket {
+#include "talk/media/base/videoframe.h"
+#include "webrtc/media/base/videosinkinterface.h"
+#include "webrtc/media/base/videosourceinterface.h"
-class VideoFrame;
+namespace rtc {
-// Abstract interface for rendering VideoFrames.
-class VideoRenderer : public rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> {
+class VideoSourceBase : public VideoSourceInterface<cricket::VideoFrame> {
pthatcher1 2016/02/03 15:38:36 Can we call this thing something more explicit, li
perkj_webrtc 2016/02/08 14:32:01 Done.
public:
- virtual ~VideoRenderer() {}
- // Called when a new frame is available for display.
- virtual bool RenderFrame(const VideoFrame *frame) = 0;
- // Intended to replace RenderFrame.
- void OnFrame(const cricket::VideoFrame& frame) override {
- // Unused return value
- RenderFrame(&frame);
- }
+ void AddSink(VideoSinkInterface<cricket::VideoFrame>* sink,
+ const VideoSinkCapabilities& capabilities) override;
pthatcher1 2016/02/03 15:38:36 Why does AddSink take the capabilities instead of
perkj_webrtc 2016/02/08 14:32:01 Acknowledged.
+ void RemoveSink(VideoSinkInterface<cricket::VideoFrame>* sink) override;
+
+ // TODO(perkj): Make DeliverFrameToSinks protected when the hack in
+ // FrameInputWrapper->DeliverFrameToSinks (videosource.cc) has been removed.
+ void DeliverFrameToSinks(const cricket::VideoFrame& frame);
nisse-webrtc 2016/02/03 09:16:34 Is there any obvious drawback to rename this OnFra
pthatcher1 2016/02/03 15:38:36 Yes, I was thinking the same thing. I think that
perkj_webrtc 2016/02/08 14:32:01 Done.
+
+ protected:
+ bool HasSinks() const { return !sinks_.empty(); }
+
+ virtual void OnSinkCapabilitiesChanged(
+ const VideoSinkCapabilities& capabilities) = 0;
+
+ private:
+ CriticalSection sink_lock_;
nisse-webrtc 2016/02/03 09:16:34 I guess this makes sense, if used as a base class.
pthatcher1 2016/02/03 15:38:36 As mentioned earlier, I'd like to see us try makin
perkj_webrtc 2016/02/08 14:32:01 Done.
+ VideoSinkCapabilities capabilities_;
+ std::unordered_set<VideoSinkInterface<cricket::VideoFrame>*> sinks_;
nisse-webrtc 2016/02/03 09:16:34 I think Tommi objected to using std::set earlier,
pthatcher1 2016/02/03 15:38:36 Throughout our code base, we almost alway use std:
perkj_webrtc 2016/02/08 14:32:01 Done.
};
-} // namespace cricket
+} // namespace rtc
-#endif // TALK_MEDIA_BASE_VIDEORENDERER_H_
+#endif // TALK_MEDIA_BASE_VIDEOSOURCEBASE_H_

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698