Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(447)

Unified Diff: webrtc/voice_engine/channel.cc

Issue 1628683002: Use separate rtp module lists for send and receive in PacketRouter. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master
Patch Set: Add more dchecks. Created 4 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: webrtc/voice_engine/channel.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/voice_engine/channel.cc b/webrtc/voice_engine/channel.cc
index 25f44c1c66fcbaccc7543121971f0c9cda6dc4e1..36bb7e42673f47bb4d595bf7b1db18b9a6717c47 100644
--- a/webrtc/voice_engine/channel.cc
+++ b/webrtc/voice_engine/channel.cc
@@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ class RtpPacketSenderProxy : public RtpPacketSender {
rtp_packet_sender_ = rtp_packet_sender;
}
+ bool HasPacketSender() const {
+ RTC_DCHECK(thread_checker_.CalledOnValidThread());
+ rtc::CritScope lock(&crit_);
+ return rtp_packet_sender_ != nullptr;
+ }
+
// Implements RtpPacketSender.
void InsertPacket(Priority priority,
uint32_t ssrc,
@@ -2918,30 +2924,45 @@ void Channel::EnableReceiveTransportSequenceNumber(int id) {
RTC_DCHECK(ret);
}
-void Channel::SetCongestionControlObjects(
+void Channel::RegisterSenderCongestionControlObjects(
RtpPacketSender* rtp_packet_sender,
TransportFeedbackObserver* transport_feedback_observer,
PacketRouter* packet_router) {
- RTC_DCHECK(packet_router != nullptr || packet_router_ != nullptr);
- if (transport_feedback_observer) {
- RTC_DCHECK(feedback_observer_proxy_.get());
- feedback_observer_proxy_->SetTransportFeedbackObserver(
- transport_feedback_observer);
- }
- if (rtp_packet_sender) {
- RTC_DCHECK(rtp_packet_sender_proxy_.get());
- rtp_packet_sender_proxy_->SetPacketSender(rtp_packet_sender);
+ RTC_DCHECK(packet_router && !packet_router_);
+ RTC_DCHECK(transport_feedback_observer && feedback_observer_proxy_.get());
+ RTC_DCHECK(seq_num_allocator_proxy_.get());
+ RTC_DCHECK(rtp_packet_sender && rtp_packet_sender_proxy_.get());
+ feedback_observer_proxy_->SetTransportFeedbackObserver(
+ transport_feedback_observer);
+ seq_num_allocator_proxy_->SetSequenceNumberAllocator(packet_router);
+ rtp_packet_sender_proxy_->SetPacketSender(rtp_packet_sender);
+ _rtpRtcpModule->SetStorePacketsStatus(rtp_packet_sender != nullptr, 600);
+ packet_router->AddRtpModule(_rtpRtcpModule.get(), true);
the sun 2016/01/28 15:33:45 Could we call _rtpRtcpModule->SetSendingMediaStatu
stefan-webrtc 2016/01/28 15:52:00 I think we can, but as I'm not likely to be able t
+ packet_router_ = packet_router;
+}
+
+void Channel::RegisterReceiverCongestionControlObjects(
+ PacketRouter* packet_router) {
+ RTC_DCHECK(packet_router && !packet_router_);
+ packet_router->AddRtpModule(_rtpRtcpModule.get(), false);
+ packet_router_ = packet_router;
+}
+
+void Channel::ResetCongestionControlObjects() {
+ _rtpRtcpModule->SetStorePacketsStatus(false, 600);
+ if (feedback_observer_proxy_) {
the sun 2016/01/28 15:33:45 This is always true? Do an RTC_DCHECK() like in Re
stefan-webrtc 2016/01/28 15:52:00 No, it's not true if pacing hasn't been enabled fo
the sun 2016/01/29 10:07:07 Ah ok, very well. Another option would be to alway
stefan-webrtc 2016/01/29 10:59:55 That's an option. I'll make it so.
+ feedback_observer_proxy_->SetTransportFeedbackObserver(nullptr);
}
- if (seq_num_allocator_proxy_.get()) {
- seq_num_allocator_proxy_->SetSequenceNumberAllocator(packet_router);
+ if (seq_num_allocator_proxy_) {
+ seq_num_allocator_proxy_->SetSequenceNumberAllocator(nullptr);
}
- _rtpRtcpModule->SetStorePacketsStatus(rtp_packet_sender != nullptr, 600);
- if (packet_router != nullptr) {
- packet_router->AddRtpModule(_rtpRtcpModule.get());
- } else {
- packet_router_->RemoveRtpModule(_rtpRtcpModule.get());
+ bool sender = false;
+ if (rtp_packet_sender_proxy_) {
+ sender = rtp_packet_sender_proxy_->HasPacketSender();
+ rtp_packet_sender_proxy_->SetPacketSender(nullptr);
the sun 2016/01/28 15:33:45 Always just SetPacketSender(nullptr)? Remove HasPa
stefan-webrtc 2016/01/28 15:52:00 I need HasPacketSender() to determine if it's a se
the sun 2016/01/29 10:07:07 I think a single point of decision making is prefe
stefan-webrtc 2016/01/29 10:59:55 Ack. I think it will be hard to do at the moment u
}
- packet_router_ = packet_router;
+ packet_router_->RemoveRtpModule(_rtpRtcpModule.get(), sender);
+ packet_router_ = nullptr;
}
void Channel::SetRTCPStatus(bool enable) {

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698