Removing webrtc::AudioFrame::energy_.

webrtc/modules/audio_conference_mixer/source/audio_frame_manipulator.cc

Index: webrtc/modules/audio_conference_mixer/source/audio_frame_manipulator.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/modules/audio_conference_mixer/source/audio_frame_manipulator.cc b/webrtc/modules/audio_conference_mixer/source/audio_frame_manipulator.cc
index 9c5d3b939d951c6ee8ac9d20c7a62cd5ea573b35..1e679af914b3664746971037a6a2b7cc7a60f0bc 100644
--- a/webrtc/modules/audio_conference_mixer/source/audio_frame_manipulator.cc
+++ b/webrtc/modules/audio_conference_mixer/source/audio_frame_manipulator.cc
@@ -39,16 +39,16 @@ const size_t rampSize = sizeof(rampArray)/sizeof(rampArray[0]);
 }  // namespace
 
 namespace webrtc {
-void CalculateEnergy(AudioFrame& audioFrame)
+uint32_t CalculateEnergy(const AudioFrame& audioFrame)

[hlundin-webrtc, 2016/01/19 08:25:02]

Would you consider changing this to an int? I know it potentially changes the
code behavior, but I'm thinking it is for the better. WDYT? (If so, you can also
skip the extra #include in the .h file.)

 {
-    audioFrame.energy_ = 0;
+    uint32_t energy = 0;
     for(size_t position = 0; position < audioFrame.samples_per_channel_;
         position++)
     {
         // TODO(andrew): this can easily overflow.
-        audioFrame.energy_ += audioFrame.data_[position] *
-                              audioFrame.data_[position];
+        energy += audioFrame.data_[position] * audioFrame.data_[position];
     }
+    return energy;
 }
 
 void RampIn(AudioFrame& audioFrame)