|
|
Created:
5 years, 1 month ago by ivoc Modified:
5 years ago Reviewers:
kjellander_webrtc CC:
webrtc-reviews_webrtc.org, yujie_mao (webrtc), Andrew MacDonald, tterriberry_mozilla.com, qiang.lu, niklas.enbom, peah-webrtc Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
webrtc Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionDisable all JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient tests on Mac due to flakiness on Mac Debug bots.
NOTRY=true
TBR=kjellander@webrtc.org
BUG=webrtc:5231
Committed: https://crrev.com/191c1f9d5bc1a4adbcaf87fe93214c54b3530dc8
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10716}
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 7
Messages
Total messages: 14 (6 generated)
Description was changed from ========== Disable all JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient tests on Mac due to flakiness on Mac Debug bots. BR=kjellander@webrtc.org BUG=webrtc:5231 ========== to ========== Disable all JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient tests on Mac due to flakiness on Mac Debug bots. TBR=kjellander@webrtc.org BUG=webrtc:5231 ==========
The CQ bit was checked by ivoc@webrtc.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1462933002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1462933002/1
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: android_arm64_rel on tryserver.webrtc (JOB_TIMED_OUT, no build URL)
Description was changed from ========== Disable all JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient tests on Mac due to flakiness on Mac Debug bots. TBR=kjellander@webrtc.org BUG=webrtc:5231 ========== to ========== Disable all JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient tests on Mac due to flakiness on Mac Debug bots. NOTRY=true TBR=kjellander@webrtc.org BUG=webrtc:5231 ==========
The CQ bit was checked by ivoc@webrtc.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1462933002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1462933002/1
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #1 (id:1)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/191c1f9d5bc1a4adbcaf87fe93214c54b3530dc8 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10716}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
kjellander@webrtc.org changed reviewers: + kjellander@webrtc.org
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Please make sure you publish+mail comments for CLs like this, as I didn't get any e-mail for this review (the commit-bot messages didn't produce e-mails to me since I wasn't on the reviewers list). Also a follow-up CL is needed, see comments below. https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... File talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc (right): https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1174: MAYBE_LocalP2PTestOfferDtlsButNotSdes) { Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1254: TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetAudioOutputLevelStats) { Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1273: TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetAudioInputLevelStats) { Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1284: TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetBytesReceivedStats) { Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1306: TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetBytesSentStats) { Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1359: TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetDtls12Both) { Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1575: TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_IceRestart) { Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2015/12/02 12:16:38, kjellander (webrtc) wrote: > Please make sure you publish+mail comments for CLs like this, as I didn't get > any e-mail for this review (the commit-bot messages didn't produce e-mails to me > since I wasn't on the reviewers list). > > Also a follow-up CL is needed, see comments below. > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > File talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc (right): > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1174: > MAYBE_LocalP2PTestOfferDtlsButNotSdes) { > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1254: > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetAudioOutputLevelStats) { > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1273: > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetAudioInputLevelStats) { > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1284: > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetBytesReceivedStats) { > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1306: > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetBytesSentStats) { > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1359: > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetDtls12Both) { > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1575: > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_IceRestart) { > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. Sorry about that, I didn't realise you would not receive any mails. I did TBR you on a few other CLs as well while I was sheriffing (to disable other flaky tests). I will submit the follow-up CL right away.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2015/12/03 09:53:17, ivoc wrote: > On 2015/12/02 12:16:38, kjellander (webrtc) wrote: > > Please make sure you publish+mail comments for CLs like this, as I didn't get > > any e-mail for this review (the commit-bot messages didn't produce e-mails to > me > > since I wasn't on the reviewers list). > > > > Also a follow-up CL is needed, see comments below. > > > > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > > File talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc (right): > > > > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1174: > > MAYBE_LocalP2PTestOfferDtlsButNotSdes) { > > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > > > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1254: > > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetAudioOutputLevelStats) > { > > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > > > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1273: > > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetAudioInputLevelStats) { > > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > > > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1284: > > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetBytesReceivedStats) { > > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > > > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1306: > > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetBytesSentStats) { > > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > > > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1359: > > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_GetDtls12Both) { > > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > > > > https://codereview.webrtc.org/1462933002/diff/1/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectio... > > talk/app/webrtc/peerconnection_unittest.cc:1575: > > TEST_F(MAYBE_JsepPeerConnectionP2PTestClient, MAYBE_IceRestart) { > > Please remove MAYBE_ from the test case name in a follow-up CL. > > Sorry about that, I didn't realise you would not receive any mails. I did TBR > you on a few other CLs as well while I was sheriffing (to disable other flaky > tests). I will submit the follow-up CL right away. No worries. I also thought at least one e-mail was sent when you TBR= someone and submit from command line. Can you find the other CLs and publish comments for them as well, so I don't have to dig them up myself? |