Index: talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc |
diff --git a/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc b/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc |
index bee6380bf46a17275bf2bd3fb1c3e2e7ae42497c..3a9ba0c241d6b4a86c64c195c2ebc2e03b6911d9 100644 |
--- a/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc |
+++ b/talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectioninterface_unittest.cc |
@@ -1948,8 +1948,10 @@ TEST_F(PeerConnectionInterfaceTest, LocalDescriptionChanged) { |
EXPECT_TRUE(ContainsSender(senders, kVideoTracks[1])); |
// Remove an audio and video track. |
+ pc_->RemoveStream(reference_collection_->at(0)); |
rtc::scoped_ptr<SessionDescriptionInterface> desc_2; |
CreateSessionDescriptionAndReference(1, 1, desc_2.accept()); |
+ pc_->AddStream(reference_collection_->at(0)); |
pthatcher1
2015/10/20 17:42:49
Was this test wrong before?
Taylor Brandstetter
2015/10/21 00:22:08
No, there's an intentional change in behavior. Pre
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DoSetLocalDescription(desc_2.release())); |
senders = pc_->GetSenders(); |
EXPECT_EQ(2u, senders.size()); |