Removing M API call for now to green up downstream.

Removing M API call for now to green up downstream.

BUG=None

Committed: https://crrev.com/c671139ef22875c34368dd72bbdffe76640239bf
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10219}

[phoglund, 2015-10-08 12:35:28]

phoglund@webrtc.org changed reviewers:
+ henrika@webrtc.org

[henrika_webrtc, 2015-10-08 12:44:26]

LGTM

[phoglund, 2015-10-08 12:47:50]

The CQ bit was checked by phoglund@webrtc.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-10-08 12:48:00]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1392903005/20001
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1392903005/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-10-08 13:33:52]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-10-08 13:34:04]

Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/c671139ef22875c34368dd72bbdffe76640239bf
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10219}

[kjellander (google.com), 2015-10-08 14:59:34]

kjellander@google.com changed reviewers:
+ kjellander@google.com

[kjellander (google.com), 2015-10-08 14:59:35]

Please create a bug to track this and cc henrika@webrtc.org + reference it from
the code.

[kjellander (google.com), 2015-10-08 15:07:13]

On 2015/10/08 14:59:35, kjellander (DO NOT USE THIS) wrote:
> Please create a bug to track this and cc mailto:henrika@webrtc.org + reference
it from
> the code.

Ah, it's too late. I'll leave it to you then (if you bother creating a follow-up
or just is going to make sure you get it fixed in the future).

[phoglund, 2015-10-08 15:08:37]

On 2015/10/08 15:07:13, kjellander (DO NOT USE THIS) wrote:
> On 2015/10/08 14:59:35, kjellander (DO NOT USE THIS) wrote:
> > Please create a bug to track this and cc mailto:henrika@webrtc.org +
reference
> it from
> > the code.
> 
> Ah, it's too late. I'll leave it to you then (if you bother creating a
follow-up
> or just is going to make sure you get it fixed in the future).

Sure, I can make a bug, the question is just if that will help. I think having
a TODO in the code is reasonable.

[kjellander_webrtc, 2015-10-08 15:13:05]

On 2015/10/08 15:08:37, phoglund wrote:
> On 2015/10/08 15:07:13, kjellander (DO NOT USE THIS) wrote:
> > On 2015/10/08 14:59:35, kjellander (DO NOT USE THIS) wrote:
> > > Please create a bug to track this and cc mailto:henrika@webrtc.org +
> reference
> > it from
> > > the code.
> > 
> > Ah, it's too late. I'll leave it to you then (if you bother creating a
> follow-up
> > or just is going to make sure you get it fixed in the future).
> 
> Sure, I can make a bug, the question is just if that will help. I think having
> a TODO in the code is reasonable.

You decide, IMHO TODOs are easier to forget than bugs, and it's harder to
reassign them, follow them and loop in additional people...