Fix ChromeOS build (C99 break)

Fix ChromeOS build (C99 break)

BUG=webrtc:5016
TBR=henrik.lundin@webrtc.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/2803a40fe335a29f9584911d1a52856bdb302df7
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9992}

[Henrik Grunell WebRTC, 2015-09-18 13:36:05]

henrikg@webrtc.org changed reviewers:
+ henrik.lundin@webrtc.org, torbjorng@webrtc.org

[torbjorng (webrtc), 2015-09-18 13:39:17]

lgtm

[hlundin-webrtc, 2015-09-18 13:43:06]

lgtm

[Henrik Grunell WebRTC, 2015-09-18 13:44:34]

The CQ bit was checked by henrikg@webrtc.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-09-18 13:44:47]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1354163002/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1354163002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-09-18 14:50:49]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-09-18 14:51:00]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/2803a40fe335a29f9584911d1a52856bdb302df7
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9992}

[kjellander_webrtc, 2015-09-21 07:32:11]

kjellander@webrtc.org changed reviewers:
+ kjellander@webrtc.org

[kjellander_webrtc, 2015-09-21 07:32:11]

So, should we revert the entire https://codereview.webrtc.org/1321193003/
instead to prevent this from happening again? Or can we talk to Chrome OS to
convince them updating their compiler configuration instead? C89 is really
old...

[hlundin-webrtc, 2015-09-21 10:58:12]

On 2015/09/21 07:32:11, kjellander (webrtc) wrote:
> So, should we revert the entire https://codereview.webrtc.org/1321193003/
> instead to prevent this from happening again? Or can we talk to Chrome OS to
> convince them updating their compiler configuration instead? C89 is really
> old...

Newer must of course be better. What is their rationale for sticking to C89?

[torbjorng (webrtc), 2015-09-21 11:18:43]

On 2015/09/21 10:58:12, hlundin-webrtc wrote:

> Newer must of course be better. What is their rationale for sticking to C89?

I think it is safe to assume that this is related to that c89 is
still the default mode for compilers.

Let's move to a 16 year old standard and consider the 26 old standard
as deprecated.  :-)