Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(22)

Unified Diff: webrtc/base/ratetracker_unittest.cc

Issue 1279433006: Add a rate tracker that tracks rate over a given interval split up into buckets that accumulate uni… (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git@master
Patch Set: Win64 fix Created 5 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: webrtc/base/ratetracker_unittest.cc
diff --git a/webrtc/base/ratetracker_unittest.cc b/webrtc/base/ratetracker_unittest.cc
index 1c20fd05a2732c7e14e61713fbe3da6d645f5bd5..f0a3a9675f40a4f1aa939743e2e47a297100adb4 100644
--- a/webrtc/base/ratetracker_unittest.cc
+++ b/webrtc/base/ratetracker_unittest.cc
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright 2010 The WebRTC Project Authors. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright 2015 The WebRTC Project Authors. All rights reserved.
*
* Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
* that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ namespace rtc {
class RateTrackerForTest : public RateTracker {
public:
- RateTrackerForTest() : time_(0) {}
+ RateTrackerForTest() : RateTracker(100u, 10u), time_(0) {}
virtual uint32 Time() const { return time_; }
void AdvanceTime(uint32 delta) { time_ += delta; }
@@ -23,59 +23,102 @@ class RateTrackerForTest : public RateTracker {
uint32 time_;
};
-TEST(RateTrackerTest, TestBasics) {
+TEST(RateTrackerTest, Test30FPS) {
RateTrackerForTest tracker;
- EXPECT_EQ(0U, tracker.total_units());
- EXPECT_EQ(0U, tracker.units_second());
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 300; ++i) {
+ tracker.AddSamples(1);
+ tracker.AdvanceTime(33);
+ if (i % 3 == 0) {
+ tracker.AdvanceTime(1);
+ }
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(30u, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(50000u));
noahric 2015/09/03 21:42:24 Is there a version of this for doubles/floats that
tpsiaki 2015/09/03 23:28:59 Done.
+}
+
+TEST(RateTrackerTest, Test60FPS) {
+ RateTrackerForTest tracker;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 300; ++i) {
+ tracker.AddSamples(1);
+ tracker.AdvanceTime(16);
+ if (i % 3 != 0) {
+ tracker.AdvanceTime(1);
+ }
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(60u, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
+}
+
+TEST(RateTrackerTest, TestRateTrackerBasics) {
+ RateTrackerForTest tracker;
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
// Add a sample.
- tracker.Update(1234);
+ tracker.AddSamples(1234);
// Advance the clock by 100 ms.
tracker.AdvanceTime(100);
- // total_units should advance, but units_second should stay 0.
- EXPECT_EQ(1234U, tracker.total_units());
- EXPECT_EQ(0U, tracker.units_second());
+ EXPECT_EQ(12340U, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
+ EXPECT_EQ(12340U, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U, tracker.TotalSampleCount());
+ EXPECT_EQ(12340U, tracker.ComputeTotalRate());
// Repeat.
- tracker.Update(1234);
+ tracker.AddSamples(1234);
tracker.AdvanceTime(100);
- EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.total_units());
- EXPECT_EQ(0U, tracker.units_second());
+ EXPECT_EQ(12340U, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
+ EXPECT_EQ(12340U, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.TotalSampleCount());
+ EXPECT_EQ(12340U, tracker.ComputeTotalRate());
// Advance the clock by 800 ms, so we've elapsed a full second.
// units_second should now be filled in properly.
tracker.AdvanceTime(800);
- EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.total_units());
- EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.units_second());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.TotalSampleCount());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.ComputeTotalRate());
// Poll the tracker again immediately. The reported rate should stay the same.
- EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.total_units());
- EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.units_second());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.TotalSampleCount());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.ComputeTotalRate());
// Do nothing and advance by a second. We should drop down to zero.
tracker.AdvanceTime(1000);
- EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.total_units());
- EXPECT_EQ(0U, tracker.units_second());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2, tracker.TotalSampleCount());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U, tracker.ComputeTotalRate());
// Send a bunch of data at a constant rate for 5.5 "seconds".
// We should report the rate properly.
for (int i = 0; i < 5500; i += 100) {
- tracker.Update(9876U);
+ tracker.AddSamples(9876U);
tracker.AdvanceTime(100);
}
- EXPECT_EQ(9876U * 10, tracker.units_second());
+ EXPECT_EQ(9876U * 10, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
+ EXPECT_EQ(9876U * 10, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2 + 9876U * 55, tracker.TotalSampleCount());
+ EXPECT_EQ((1234U * 2 + 9876U * 55) / 7.5, tracker.ComputeTotalRate());
// Advance the clock by 500 ms. Since we sent nothing over this half-second,
// the reported rate should be reduced by half.
tracker.AdvanceTime(500);
- EXPECT_EQ(9876U * 5, tracker.units_second());
+ EXPECT_EQ(9876U * 5, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
+ EXPECT_EQ(9876U * 5, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234U * 2 + 9876U * 55, tracker.TotalSampleCount());
+ EXPECT_EQ((1234U * 2 + 9876U * 55) / 8.0, tracker.ComputeTotalRate());
+
+ // Rate over the last half second should be zero.
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(500u));
noahric 2015/09/03 21:42:24 Can you also test (1) elapsed time > number of buc
tpsiaki 2015/09/03 23:28:59 Done.
}
TEST(RateTrackerTest, TestGetUnitSecondsAfterInitialValue) {
RateTrackerForTest tracker;
- tracker.Update(1234);
+ tracker.AddSamples(1234);
tracker.AdvanceTime(1000);
- EXPECT_EQ(1234u, tracker.units_second());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234u, tracker.ComputeCurrentRate(1000u));
}
} // namespace rtc

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698